This paper proposes the Three-Layer University Agentic AI Governance Model (TUAIGM), a proposed governance model for universities that are beginning to consider agentic AI in areas where decisions directly affect students.
The paper argues that agentic AI exposes three governance weaknesses: diffused accountability, goal misalignment, and behavioural drift. These risks are especially difficult in universities because authority is already distributed across board, administrative, and faculty structures.
The TUAIGM assigns oversight responsibilities to three institutional layers and connects them through escalation, authorisation, reporting, and vendor-accountability flows.
The framework has not been empirically tested. It is a proposed governance model that tries to make responsibility, monitoring, and intervention more explicit before agentic systems become embedded in university operations.
The main contribution is applying principal-agent theory to the multi-principal university setting, where board, administration, and faculty share authority but do not always share the same priorities.