Volume 7, Issue 3 (SEPTEMBER ISSUE 2026)                   johepal 2026, 7(3): 147-153 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Safaei A, Safaei M. (2026). Beyond Advisory Governance: A Three-Layer Model for Agentic AI in Universities. johepal. 7(3), 147-153. doi:10.66224/johepal.7.3.147
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-1953-en.html
Abstract:   (8 Views)
  • This paper proposes the Three-Layer University Agentic AI Governance Model (TUAIGM), a proposed governance model for universities that are beginning to consider agentic AI in areas where decisions directly affect students.
  • The paper argues that agentic AI exposes three governance weaknesses: diffused accountability, goal misalignment, and behavioural drift. These risks are especially difficult in universities because authority is already distributed across board, administrative, and faculty structures.
  • The TUAIGM assigns oversight responsibilities to three institutional layers and connects them through escalation, authorisation, reporting, and vendor-accountability flows.
  • The framework has not been empirically tested. It is a proposed governance model that tries to make responsibility, monitoring, and intervention more explicit before agentic systems become embedded in university operations.
  • The main contribution is applying principal-agent theory to the multi-principal university setting, where board, administration, and faculty share authority but do not always share the same priorities.
Full-Text [PDF 1433 kb]   (1 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2026/06/8 | Accepted: 2026/09/16 | Published: 2026/09/30

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb