<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies</title>
<title_fa>نشریه سیاست و رهبری آموزش عالی</title_fa>
<short_title>johepal</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://johepal.com</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2717-1426</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2717-1426</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/johepal</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1405</year>
	<month>6</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2026</year>
	<month>9</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>7</volume>
<number>3</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Beyond Advisory Governance: A Three-Layer Model for Agentic AI in Universities</title>
	<subject_fa>تخصصي</subject_fa>
	<subject>Special</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li style=&quot;text-align:justify; margin-left:8px&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Source Sans Pro;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:normal&quot;&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-CA&quot; style=&quot;font-size:12.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;This paper proposes the Three-Layer University Agentic AI Governance Model (TUAIGM), a proposed governance model for universities that are beginning to consider agentic AI in areas where decisions directly affect students.&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-CA&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Calibri Light&amp;quot;,sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li style=&quot;text-align:justify; margin-left:8px&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Source Sans Pro;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:normal&quot;&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-CA&quot; style=&quot;font-size:12.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-CA&quot;&gt;The paper argues that agentic AI exposes three governance weaknesses: diffused accountability, goal misalignment, and behavioural drift. These risks are especially difficult in universities because authority is already distributed across board, administrative, and faculty structures.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li style=&quot;text-align:justify; margin-left:8px&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Source Sans Pro;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:normal&quot;&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-CA&quot; style=&quot;font-size:12.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-CA&quot;&gt;The TUAIGM assigns oversight responsibilities to three institutional layers and connects them through escalation, authorisation, reporting, and vendor-accountability flows.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li style=&quot;text-align:justify; margin-left:8px&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Source Sans Pro;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:normal&quot;&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-CA&quot; style=&quot;font-size:12.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-CA&quot;&gt;The framework has not been empirically tested. It is a proposed governance model that tries to make responsibility, monitoring, and intervention more explicit before agentic systems become embedded in university operations.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li style=&quot;text-align:justify; margin-left:8px&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Source Sans Pro;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:normal&quot;&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-CA&quot; style=&quot;font-size:12.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span lang=&quot;EN-CA&quot;&gt;The main contribution is applying principal-agent theory to the multi-principal university setting, where board, administration, and faculty share authority but do not always share the same priorities.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Agentic AI, Higher Education Governance, Principal–Agent Theory, Accountability, Shared Governance, Student Rights</keyword>
	<start_page>147</start_page>
	<end_page>153</end_page>
	<web_url>http://johepal.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1723-2&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Amin </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Safaei</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846005257</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846005257</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation></affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>Nottingham Trent University (NTU)</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Mahshid </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Safaei</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>10031947532846005258</code>
	<orcid>10031947532846005258</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation></affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa>Allameh Tabataba'i University (ATU)</affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
