Volume 5, Issue 3 (SEPTEMBER ISSUE 2024)                   johepal 2024, 5(3): 113-132 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Núñez-Acosta A, Sánchez-García J Y, Ramirez-Nafarrate A. (2024). Factors Affecting Researchers’ Incentive Preferences: A Cross Sectional Study of Private Universities in Mexico. johepal. 5(3), 113-132. doi:10.61186/johepal.5.3.113
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-847-en.html
Abstract:   (74 Views)
Incentives to scientific products have become an important tool to increase research productivity in universities around the world, usually through financial incentives policies aimed to foster publications or citations. In this paper, we study the preferences of researchers regarding research incentives in Mexican private universities. Through statistical methods, including z-tests for differences in proportions and correlation tests, we analyzed the results of a survey applied to researchers of business and engineering areas. Results suggest that demographic aspects like age, rather than salary range and years of experience, influence researcher’s incentive preferences, and that non-financial incentives are significant to young researchers. We also find that timing for receiving incentives is a significant factor that might drive researchers’ decisions. This study contributes to identifying the right incentives for researchers, considering that in Mexico these incentive programs are entirely financed by universities. The relevance of this research is that it allows policymakers to design comprehensive research policies including not only university research goals, but also researchers’ preferences to ensure their commitment and motivation.
Full-Text [PDF 1757 kb]   (33 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2024/05/10 | Accepted: 2024/09/13 | Published: 2024/09/30

References
1. AlShareef, M. R., Alrammah, I. A., Alshoukani, N. A., & Almalik, A. M. (2023). The impact of financial incentives on research production: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Scientometrics, 128(5), 3067-3089. [DOI]
2. Andersen, L. B., & Pallesen, T. (2008). “Not just for the money?” How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research institutions. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 28-47. [DOI]
3. Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99(1), 544-555. [DOI]
4. Babbie, E. R. (1973). Survey research methods. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
5. Baumann, S. (2022). Research profile clusters among lecturers in non-traditional higher education. An exploratory analysis in the Swiss context. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100182. [DOI]
6. Campos-Mercade, P., Meier, A. N., Schneider, F. H., Meier, S., Pope, D., & Wengström, E. (2021). Monetary incentives increase COVID-19 vaccinations. Science, 374(6569), 879-882. [DOI]
7. Emanuel, E. J., Ubel, P. A., Kessler, J. B., Meyer, G., Muller, R. W., Navathe, A. S., Patel, P., Pearl, R., Rosenthal, M. B., Sacks, L., Sen, A. P., Sherman, P., & Volpp, K. G. (2016). Using behavioral economics to design physician incentives that deliver high-value care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 164(2), 114-119. [DOI]
8. Fernández, E., Valle, S., & Pérez-Bustamante, G. (2021). Business excellence practice: Efficiency wages versus individual economic incentives. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(13-14), 1532-1547. [DOI]
9. Field, L., & Greenwood, V. (2015). Using outperformance pay to motivate academics: Insiders’ accounts of promises and problems. Australian Universities’ Review, 57(2), 5-16. [Article]
10. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351-401. [DOI]
11. Fuster, A., & Meier, S. (2010). Another hidden cost of incentives: The detrimental effect on norm enforcement. Management Science, 56(1), 57-70. [DOI]
12. Ghozi, S., Kurniawan, F., Wibawa, A. P., & Hidayat, D. (2023). Drivers and barriers in conducting research in polytechnics: A content analysis of open-ended responses. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 4(1), 84-100. [DOI]
13. Gonzalez-Brambila, C., & Veloso, F. M. (2007). The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers. Research Policy, 36(7), 1035-1051. [DOI]
14. Gregorutti, G. (2010). Moving from a predominantly teaching oriented culture to a research productivity mission: The case of Mexico and the United States. Excellence in Higher Education, 1(1&2), 69-83. [DOI]
15. Hao, D. (2023). Study on incentive factors and incentive effect differences of teachers in universities and colleges under the view of demographic variables. BMC sPsychology, 11, 379. [DOI]
16. Harter, C. L., Becker, W. E., & Watts, M. (2011). Time allocations and reward structures for US academic economists from 1995-2005: Evidence from three national surveys. International Review of Economics Education, 10(2), 6-27. [DOI]
17. Hassan, E., Groot, W., & Volante, L. (2022). Education funding and learning outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of reviews. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100181. [DOI]
18. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). John Wiley.
19. Jeffrey, S. A., Dickinson, A. M., & Einarsson, Y. F. (2013). The use of incentives in organizations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(6), 606-615. [DOI]
20. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. [DOI]
21. Kim, D. H., & Bak, H. -J. (2020). Reconciliation between monetary incentives and motivation crowding-out: The influence of perceptions of incentives on research performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(6), 1292-1317. [DOI]
22. Kyeremanteng, K., Robidoux, R., D’Egidio, G., Fernando, S. M., & Neilipovitz, D. (2019). An analysis of pay-for-performance schemes and their potential impacts on health systems and outcomes for patients. Critical Care Research and Practice. [DOI]
23. Kyvik, S., & Aksnes, D. W. (2015). Explaining the increase in publication productivity among academic staff: A generational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 40(8), 1438-1453. [DOI]
24. Lacorte Ayroza, I. F., Rodrigues, W., Souza Rocha, H., & Pedroza Filho, M. X. (2019). Avaliação do Programa de Produtividade em Pesquisa da Universidade Federal do Tocantins: um Olhar Sob a Ótica da Economia Comportamental. Revista de Economia Contemporanea, 23(1), 1-24. [DOI]
25. Levitt, S. D., List, J. A., Neckermann, S., & Sadoff, S. (2016). The behavioralist goes to school: Leveraging behavioral economics to improve educational performance. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(4), 183-219. [DOI]
26. Li, S., & Ou-Yang, H. (2010). Explicit incentives, implicit incentives, and performance: Evidence from academic tenure. SSRN. [DOI]
27. Lubarsky, D. A., French, M. T., Gitlow, H. S., Rosen, L. F., & Ullmann, S. G. (2019). Why money alone can’t (always) “nudge” physicians: The role of behavioral economics in the design of physician incentives. Anesthesiology, 130, 154-170. [DOI]
28. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396. [DOI]
29. McGill, B., O’Hara, B. J., Bauman, A., Grunseit, A. C., & Phongsavan, P. (2019). Are financial incentives for lifestyle behavior change informed or inspired by behavioral economics? A mapping review. American Journal of Health Promotion, 33(1), 131-141. [DOI]
30. Mitchell, M. S., Goodman, J. M., Alter, D. A., John, L. K., Oh, P. I., Pakosh, M. T., & Faulkner, G. E. (2013). Financial incentives for exercise adherence in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(5), 658-667. [DOI]
31. Mitchell, M. S., Goodman, J. M., Alter, D. A., Oh, P. I., & Faulkner, G. E. J. (2015). Development of the health incentive program questionnaire (HIP-Q) in a cardiac rehabilitation population. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 5(4), 443-459. [DOI]
32. Necker, S. (2016). Why do scientists cheat? Insights from behavioral economics. Review of Social Economy, 74(1), 98-108. [DOI]
33. Njenga, M. (2023). Continuing professional development of vocational teachers in Kenya: Motivations, practices and teacher profiles. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100282. [DOI]
34. QS Quacquarelli Symonds. (2024). QS University Rankings for LatAm and The Caribbean 2024 | Top Universities. [Article]
35. Riaz, H., Akhtar, C. S., & Aslam, R. (2018). Total rewards and employee performance : Investigating the mediating role of employee motivation in Telecom sector. Pakistan Administrative Review, 2(3), 342-356. [Article]
36. Sánchez-Cruz, E. (2021). Mexican Higher Education and the Production of Knowledge. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 2(2), 6-19. [DOI]
37. Sánchez-Cruz, E. (2022). The production of knowledge during the 4th industrial revolution: A Mexican case study. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 3(3), 55-69. [DOI]
38. Sarwar, A., Aftab, H., Arif, A., & Naeem, M. (2014). Performance related pay: A comparative study on public and private universities. Science International (Lahore), 26(1), 489-497.
39. Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261-264. [DOI]
40. Skylark, W. J., Chan, K. T. F., Farmer, G. D., Gaskin, K. W., & Miller, A. R. (2020). The delay-reward heuristic: What do people expect in intertemporal choice tasks? Judgment and Decision Making, 15(5), 611-629. [DOI]
41. Stefanovska-Petkovska, M., & Bojadziev, M. (2017). Cash or compliment? Older employees preference of financial versus non-financial incentives. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 13(1), 63-71. [DOI]
42. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. [DOI]
43. UNAM. (2023). Ex3cum - Explorador de datos. [Article]
44. Vlaev, I., King, D., Darzi, A., & Dolan, P. (2019). Changing health behaviors using financial incentives: A review from behavioral economics. BMC Public Health, 19, 1059. [DOI]
45. Von Bonsdorff, M. E. (2011). Age-related differences in reward preferences. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(6), 1262-1276. [DOI]
46. Wallace, N. (2016). Behavioral economics and obesity: An analysis of fitness-based tax incentives. Policy Perspectives, 23, 76-93. [DOI]
47. Way, M. M. (2014). Efficiency wages. In C. L. Cooper, & R. E. McAuliffe (Eds.), Wiley encyclopedia of management. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [DOI]
48. Wiese, M., & Coetzee, R. (2014). The importance of non-financial motivators to pharmaceutical sales representatives: A demographic study. Southern African Business Review, 17(1), 23-56. [Article]
49. World Bank (2022); United Nations (2022) – processed by Our World in Data. (2023). Scientific and technical journal articles per million people. [Article]
50. Yousaf, S., Latif, M., Aslam, S., & Saddiqui, A. (2014). Impact of financial and non financial rewards on employee motivation. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 21(10), 1776-1786. [Article]
51. Zaresani, A., & Scott, A. (2021). Is the evidence on the effectiveness of pay for performance schemes in healthcare changing? Evidence from a meta-regression analysis. BMC Health Services Research, 21, 175. [DOI]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb