Wed, Oct 16, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 5, Issue 3 (SEPTEMBER ISSUE 2024)
johepal 2024, 5(3): 66-86 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Manarbek G, Kondybayeva S. (2024). Quality Assurance Practices in Higher Education: Lessons from the U.S. and Implications for Kazakhstan. johepal. 5(3), 66-86. doi:10.61186/johepal.5.3.66
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-845-en.html
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-845-en.html
Abstract: (88 Views)
This study explores quality assurance practices in the higher education system of the United States, focusing on implications for higher education in Kazakhstan. Examining these practices is crucial due to the prevalent use of peer review mechanisms in higher education quality management. Understanding how quality management operates in this context is essential for Kazakhstan's ongoing efforts to enhance the quality of its higher education system and align with international standards. The paper uses content-based analysis to scrutinise quality evaluation documentation, drawing insights from the U.S. quality assurance experience, using correlation analysis. The research findings reveal the importance of internal institutional assessment and evaluation procedures in improving the quality of higher education and fostering continuous enhancement processes. The conclusion offers insights into how the research findings can enhance quality management practices within the Kazakhstani higher education system. Recommendations include reconsidering accreditation agency guidelines and establishing a national independent organization to oversee the accreditation activities of accreditation bodies, ensuring quality education and providing ongoing training for quality managers in Kazakhstani higher education institutions.
Keywords: Accreditation, Quality Management, Innovation Management, Quality Assurance, Higher Education, Kazakhstan, U.S.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2024/07/16 | Accepted: 2024/09/4 | Published: 2024/09/30
Received: 2024/07/16 | Accepted: 2024/09/4 | Published: 2024/09/30
Online Supplement [PDF 1133 KB] (5 Download)
References
1. About CHEA. (n.d.) The Council for Higher Education Accreditation. [Article]
2. About ENQA. (n.d.) The European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. [Article]
3. Alderman, G. (2005). Compliance or quality?: American and British approaches to the accreditation of higher education institutions. College and University, 81(1), 17-22.
4. Alzafari, K., & Ursin, J. (2019). Implementation of quality assurance standards in European higher education: Does context matter? Quality in Higher Education, 25(1), 58-75. [DOI]
5. Bejan S. A., Janatuinen T., Jurvelin J., Klöpping S., Malinen H., Minke B., & Vacareanu R. (2015). Quality assurance and its impact from higher education institutions’ perspectives: Methodological approaches, experiences and expectations. Quality in Higher Education, 21(3), 343-371. [DOI]
6. Bernhard A. (2012). Quality assurance in an international higher education area: A summary of a case-study approach and comparative analysis. Tertiary Education and Management. 18(2), 153-169. [DOI]
7. CHEA Standards and Procedures for Recognition. (2021). Council for Higher Education Accreditation/ CHEA International Quality Group. [Article]
8. Damanpour, F. (2014). Footnotes to Research on Management Innovation. Organization Studies, 35(9), 1265-1285. [DOI]
9. Damian R., Grifoll J., & Rigbers A. (2016). On the role of impact evaluation of quality assurance from the strategic perspective of quality assurance agencies in the European higher education area. Quality in Higher Education, 21(3), 251-269. [DOI]
10. Database of Institutions and Programs Accredited by Recognized U.S. Accrediting Organizations. [Article]
11. Database of registered agencies. [Article]
12. Eaton, J. S. (2004). Accreditation and recognition of qualifications in higher education: The United States. In Quality and recognition in higher education: The cross-border challenge (pp. 63-74). OECD Publishing. [DOI]
13. Eligibility Requirements for Accreditation. (2014). Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges. Western Association of Schools and Colleges - Accreditation Standards (ACCJC). [Article]
14. El-Khawas, E. (2001). Accreditation in the USA: Origins, developments and future prospects. IIEP UNESCO. [Article]
15. ENIC-Kazakhstan. (n.d.). Higher education development. Register of recognized accreditation bodies / educational organizations / educational programmes. [Article]
16. Ferreira, C., Vidal, J., & Vieira, M. J. (2014). Student guidance and attention to diversity in the processes of quality assurance in higher education. European Journal of Education, 49(4), 575-589. [DOI]
17. Flasdick, J., Michel, L. P., & Legait, A. (2006). The maze of accreditation in European higher education. In U. –D. Ehlers, & J. M. Pawlowski (Eds.), Handbook on quality and standardisation in e-learning (pp. 51-64). Springer. [DOI]
18. Grant, D., Mergen, E., Widrick S. (2004). A comparative analysis of quality management in US and international universities. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15(4), 423-438. [DOI]
19. Hamel G. (2006). The why, what and how of management innovation. Harvard Business Review. [Article]
20. Handbook of Accreditation. (2013). WASC Senior College and University Commission (WSCUC). [Article]
21. Harvey, L., & Williams, J. (2010). Fifteen years of quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), 3-36. [DOI]
22. Haug, G. (2003). Quality assurance/accreditation in the emerging European higher education area: A possible scenario for the future. European Journal of Education, 38(3), 229-241. [DOI]
23. HLC Policy Book. (2022). Higher Learning Commission (HLC).
24. Hüsig, S., & Mann, H. -G. (2010). The role of promoters in effecting innovation in higher education institutions. Innovation: Organization & Management, 12(2), 180-191. [DOI]
25. Kerimkulova S., & Kuzhabekova A. (2017). Quality assurance in higher education of Kazakhstan: A review of the system and issues. In M. Shah, & Q. T. N. Do (Eds.), The rise of quality assurance in Asian higher education (pp. 87-108). Chandos Publishing. [DOI]
26. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
27. Luo, A. (2023, June 22). Content analysis: Guide, methods & examples. [Article]
28. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. [DOI]
29. Murray, F. B. (2009). An accreditation dilemma: The tension between program accountability and program improvement in programmatic accreditation. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(145), 59-68. [DOI]
30. NWCCU Standards. (2020). Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU). [Article]
31. Perryer, C., & Egan, V. (2015). Business school accreditation in developing countries: A case in Kazakhstan. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 2(2), 11. [DOI]
32. Phillips, S. D., & Kinser, K. (Eds.) (2018). Accreditation on the edge: Challenging quality assurance in higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Polonsky, M. J., & Waller, D. S. (2019). Designing and managing a research project: A business student’s guide. SAGE Publications, Inc.
34. Pushpakumara, H. M. C., Jayaweera, P. M., & Wanniarachchige, M. K. (2023). Issues and challenges of quality assurance in higher education institutes: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management Matters, 10(1), 49-65. [DOI]
35. Rhoades G., & Sporn B. (2002). Quality assurance in Europe and the U.S.: Professional and political economic framing of higher education policy. Higher Education, 43(3), 355-390. [DOI]
36. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusions of innovations: Modifications of a model for telecommunications. In M. -W. Stoetzer, & A. Mahler (Eds.), Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation (pp. 25-38). Springer. [DOI]
37. Romanowski, M. H., & Karkouti, I. M. (2024). United States accreditation in higher education: Does it dilute academic freedom? Quality in Higher Education, 30(1), 97-111. [DOI]
38. Salto, D. J. (2021). Beyond national regulation in higher education? Revisiting regulation and understanding organisational responses to foreign accreditation of management education programmes. Quality in Higher Education, 27(2), 206-221. [DOI]
39. Sánchez-Chaparro, T., Remaud, B., Gómez-Frías, V., Duykaerts, C., & Jolly, A. –M. (2022). Benefits and challenges of cross-border quality assurance in higher education. A case study in engineering education in Europe. Quality in Higher Education, 28(3), 308-325. [DOI]
40. Saunders, V. M. (2007). Does the accreditation process affect program quality? A qualitative study of perceptions of the higher education accountability system on learning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Temple University.
41. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). (2015). [Article]
42. Standards for Accreditation and Requirements of Affiliation (13th ed.) (2015). Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE). [Article]
43. Standards for Accreditation. (2020). New England Commission of Higher Education (NECHE). [Article]
44. Stanley, E. C., & Patrick, W. J. (1998). Quality assurance in American and British higher education: A comparison. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1998(99), 39-56. [DOI]
45. Stensaker, B. (2011). Accreditation of higher education in Europe – moving towards the US model? Journal of Education Policy, 26(6), 757-769. [DOI]
46. Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (2006). Old wine in new bottles? A comparison of public and private accreditation schemes in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 19(1), 65-85. [DOI]
47. The Principles of Accreditation: Foundations for Quality Enhancement. (2009). Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC). [Article]
48. Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs. (n.d.) Federal Student Aid. [Article]
49. Vaccaro, I. G., Jansen, J. J. P., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2012). Management innovation and leadership: The moderating role of organizational size. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 28-51. [DOI]
50. Zabiiaka, I., Nefodov, D., Hryashchevskaya, L., Horvat, M., & Shynkaruk, O. (2023). Foreign experience in quality assurance within the innovative space of higher education. Revista Eduweb, 17(4), 141-153. [DOI]
51. Zavale, N. C. (2022). Challenges of accreditation in an African university: Reflections from the Eduardo Mondlane University, in Mozambique. Quality in Higher Education, 28(2), 236-260. [DOI]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
