Volume 4, Issue 4 (DECEMBER ISSUE 2023)                   johepal 2023, 4(4): 160-170 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Syaebani M I, Wibowo P P, Faradynawati I A A. (2023). The Glass Ceiling Phenomenon: Experiences of Female Workers in Indonesian HEIs and Its Relationship with Self-Efficacy and Self-Confidence. johepal. 4(4), 160-170. doi:10.61186/johepal.4.4.160
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-535-en.html
Abstract:   (426 Views)
There are some sectors, such as higher education, that are associated with feminine qualities. In several Indonesian universities, the percentage of female lecturers far exceeds that of males, rendering higher education a sector predominantly led by women. Despite dominating the sector, women still face the glass ceiling phenomenon when reaching top management positions in universities. External factors, such as unsupportive organisations, have been recognised as the leading causes of this issue thus far. However, the role played by individual factors, such as self-esteem and self-confidence, in perpetuating the glass ceiling is hardly ever acknowledged. Using a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach, this study aims to investigate the experiences of female academics in Indonesia concerning the glass ceiling phenomenon in relation to individual factors. The data analysis findings confirm that individual factors are as significant as external factors in perpetuating the glass ceiling. The gender quota policy is inadequate in resolving the glass ceiling phenomenon. However, this policy may contribute to positive exposure for women, suggesting that women possess the same abilities as men and may ultimately enhance women's confidence in their abilities.
Full-Text [PDF 1659 kb]   (240 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2023/09/18 | Accepted: 2023/12/10 | Published: 2023/12/31

1. Aruan, D. C. (2020). Sumber Daya Manusia dan Gender Pada Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia (Human Resource Management and Gender in Higher Education in Indonesia). Knowledge Sector Initiative (KSI). [Article]
2. Astuti, I. (2018, December 05). Perempuan Berperan Penting dalam Ketahanan Keluarga (Women play an important role in family resilience). Media Indonesia. [Article]
3. Balasubramanian, S. A., & Lathabhavan, R. (2017). Women’s glass ceiling beliefs predict work engagement and burnout. Journal of Management Development, 36(9), 1125-1136. [DOI]
4. Beaman, L., Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2009). Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1497-1540. [DOI]
5. Bericat, E., & Sánchez-Bermejo, E. (2019). Gender equality. In E. Bericat & M. L. Jiménez-Rodrigo (Eds.), The Quality of European Societies: A Compilation of Composite Indicators (pp. 231-250). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. [DOI]
6. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79(1), 191-228. [DOI]
7. Bonebright, D. A., Cottledge, A. D., & Lonnquist, P. (2012). Developing women leaders on campus: A human resources-women’s center partnership at the University of Minnesota. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 14(1), 79-95. [DOI]
8. Chusmir, L. H., & Koberg, C. S. (1991). Relationship between self-confidence and sex role identity among managerial women and men. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(6), 781-790. [DOI]
9. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
11. Dowling, G. (2017). The glass ceiling: Fact or a misguided metaphor? Annals in Social Responsibility, 3(1), 23-41. [DOI]
12. Dunn, M. (2007). British army leadership: Is it gendered? Women in Management Review, 22(6), 468-481. [DOI]
13. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 807-834. [DOI]
14. Edirisinghe, C. L., & Thalgaspitiya, U. K. (2016). Investigation of barriers on glass ceiling effect among female executive employees in a selected large apparel industry in Sri Lanka. Advances in Economics and Business Management, 3(3), 291-296. [Article]
15. Gardiner, M., & Tiggemann, M. (1999). Gender differences in leadership style, job stress and mental health in male- and female-dominated industries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(3), 301-315. [DOI]
16. Innayah, M. N., & Pratama, B. C. (2019). Tantangan dan Kesempatan Wanita Dalam Lingkungan Kerja (Challenges and opportunities for women in the work environment). DERIVATIF: Jurnal Manajemen, 13(2), 8-15. [Article]
17. Jayachandran, S. (2021). Social norms as a barrier to women’s employment in developing countries. IMF Economic Review, 69(3), 576-595. [DOI]
18. Jyrkinen, M., & McKie, L. (2012). Gender, age and ageism: Experiences of women managers in Finland and Scotland. Work, Employment and Society, 26(1), 61-77. [DOI]
19. Kırmak, K. (2017). Breaking the Glass Ceiling. KPMG Turkey. [Article]
20. Kuruppuarachchi, K. A. P. S. T., & Surangi, H. A. K. N. S. (2019). The glass ceiling and women career advancement: A study based on ready – made Garment Industry in Sri Lanka. Kelaniya Journal of Management, 8(2), 18-39. [DOI]
21. Lathabhavan, R., & Balasubramanian, S. A. (2017). Glass ceiling and women employees in Asian organisations: A tri-decadal review. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 9(3), 232-246. [DOI]
22. Laurijssen, I., & Glorieux, I. (2013). Balancing work and family: A panel analysis of the impact of part-time work on the experience of time pressure. Social Indicators Research, 112(1), 1-17. [DOI]
23. Nixdorff, J. L., & Rosen, T. H. (2010). The glass ceiling women face: An examination and proposals for development of future women entrepreneurs. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 71-87. [DOI]
24. Oshagbemi, T., & Gill, R. (2003). Gender differences and similarities in the leadership styles and behaviour of UK managers. Women in Management Review, 18(6), 288-298. [DOI]
25. Pande, R., & Ford, D. (2012). Gender quotas and female leadership: A review. Background Paper for the World Development Report on Gender. World Bank. [Article]
26. Puspitawati, H. (2012). Konsep, teori dan analisis gender (Concept, theory and gender analysis). In H. Puspitawati (Ed.), Gender dan Keluarga: Konsep dan Realitas di Indonesia (Gender and family: Concept and reality in Indonesia) (Vol. 4, pp. 1-13). IPB Press.
27. Rai, U. K., & Srivastava, M. (2010). Women executives and the glass ceiling: Myths and mysteries from Razia Sultana to Hillary Clinton. BHU Management Review, 1(2), 79-83. [Article]
28. Rizwan, M., & Ahmad, R. (2015). Self-esteem deficits among psychiatric patients. SAGE Open, 5(2), 1-6. [DOI]
29. Saguni, F. (2014). Pemberian stereotype gender (Gender stereotyping). Musawa, 6(2), 195-224. [Article]
30. Simpson, R., Sturges, J., Woods, A., & Altman, Y. (2004). Career progress and career barriers: Women MBA graduates in Canada and the UK. Career Development International, 9(5), 459-477. [DOI]
31. Stempel, C. R., Rigotti, T., & Mohr, G. (2015). Think transformational leadership – Think female? Leadership, 11(3), 259-280. [DOI]
32. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2013). Gender equality in education. [Article]
33. Van Wart, M. (2003). Public-sector leadership theory: An assessment. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 214-228. [DOI]
34. Wahyuni, S. (2015). Qualitative Research Method: Theory and Practice. (2nd ed.). Salemba Empat.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb