Mon, Dec 16, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 4, Issue 4 (DECEMBER ISSUE 2023)
johepal 2023, 4(4): 32-49 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hanh N T T. (2023). Organizational Factors Affecting Lecturer Performance in HEIs in the Context of Blended Learning: An Empirical Study in Vietnam. johepal. 4(4), 32-49. doi:10.61186/johepal.4.4.32
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-528-en.html
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-528-en.html
Abstract: (1246 Views)
This study is an attempt to investigate the influence of organizational factors, including institutional policies, work environment, infrastructure, and workload on the performance of lecturers in Vietnamese higher education institutions. Performance was tested to measure their effectiveness as well as discover important variations between particular groups. This empirical study follows a quantitative approach based on the collection of authentic data through questionnaires from 200 lecturers affiliated with 10 higher education institutions in Vietnam. All quantitative data were placed in a comprehensive database and processed by using Statistical Package for the Social Science software. The study's key findings suggest that factors significantly influencing lecturer performance include training, performance evaluation, salary (institutional policies); colleague support, feedback on performance, organizational communication (work environment); furniture and computer technology (infrastructure); doing research, teaching and testing, and blended course designing (workload). The performance of lecturers is found to be unaffected by the other components in a substantial way, namely incentives, leadership, noise and light, community service. The results of the research output measurement showed that lecturers lacked research abilities. A number of managerial implications are then discussed with an aim of enhancing the performance of lecturers in higher education institutions.
Keywords: Blended Learning, Organizational Factor, Higher Education Institution (HEI), Lecturer Performance
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/10/6 | Accepted: 2023/12/12 | Published: 2023/12/31
Received: 2023/10/6 | Accepted: 2023/12/12 | Published: 2023/12/31
References
1. Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440-454. [DOI]
2. Aldraiweesh, A., & Alturki, U. (2023). Exploring factors influencing the acceptance of e-learning and students’ cooperation skills in higher education. Sustainability, 15(12), 9363. [DOI]
3. Arifani, A. Z. T., & Susanti, A. Y. (2020). Literature review factors affecting employee performance: competence, compensation and leadership. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 1(3), 538-549. [DOI]
4. Arinanye, R. T. (2015). Organizational factors affecting employee performance at The College of Computing and Information Sciences (Cocis), Makerere University, Kampala-Uganda [Unpublished master's dissertation]. Kampala: Uganda Technology and Management University.
5. Ata, R. (2016). An exploration of higher education teaching in second life in the context of blended learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(3), 9-26. [Article]
6. Auliana, S., Supriyanto, A. S., & Harini, S. (2021). Understanding teacher performance through leadership role, work environment, and work motivation. Manageria: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 155-168. [DOI]
7. Çetin, E. (2021). Digital storytelling in teacher education and its effect on the digital literacy of pre-service teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100760. [DOI]
8. Chai, J. (2022). Study on the impact of teacher salary incentives on teachers’ performance in higher education. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(5), 111-116. [DOI]
9. Danielson, C. (2008). The Handbook for Enhancing Professional Practice: Using the Framework for Teaching in Your School. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
10. Dubey, P.; Pradhan, R. L.; Sahu, K. K. (2023). Underlying factors of student engagement to e-learning. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 16(1), 17-36. [DOI]
11. Fabriz, S., Hansen, M., Heckmann, C., Mordel, J., Mendzheritskaya, J., Stehle, S., Schulze-Vorberg, L., Ulrich, I., & Horz, H. (2021). How a professional development programme for university teachers impacts their teaching-related self-efficacy, self-concept, and subjective knowledge. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(4), 738-752. [DOI]
12. Gewasari, M. (2016). The effect of teacher competence, principal pedagogical leadership, school spiritual organizational culture, job satisfaction of teacher development, achievement motivation toward teacher performance of public senior high school in Deli Serdang District. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 21(10), 29-38. [Article]
13. Hasan, M. N. (2017). Influence of work motivation, leadership and organizational culture principal of the teacher performance in vocational school (SMK) Muhammadiyah, Rembang City, Central Java Province, Indonesia. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(2), 36-44. [Article]
14. Hasbay, D., & Altındag, E. (2018). Factors that affect the performance of teachers working in secondary level education. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 22(1), 1-19.
15. Hervie, D. M., & Winful, E. C. (2018). Enhancing teachers’ performance through training and development in Ghana education service (A case study of Ebenezer senior high school). Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(1), 1-8. [DOI]
16. Huang, R., & Zhou, Y. (2012). Designing blended learning focused on knowledge category and learning activities: Case studies from Beijing Normal University. In C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 296-310). Wiley.
17. Jumani, N. B., Malik, S., & Akram, H. (2018). Challenges and successes of blended learning in directorate of distance education, IIIUI. Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning, 4(2), 143-156. [Article]
18. Kagema, J., & Irungu, C. (2018). An analysis of teacher performance appraisals and their influence on teacher performance in secondary schools in Kenya. International Journal of Education, 11(1), 93-98. [DOI]
19. Kanya, N., Fathoni, A. B., & Ramdani, Z. (2021). Factors affecting teacher performance. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1462-1468. [DOI]
20. Khan, S. H., Azhar, Z., Parveen, S., Naeem, F., & Sohail, M. M. (2012). Exploring the impact of infrastructure, pay incentives, and workplace environment on employees’ performance (A case study of Sargodha University). Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 2(4), 118-140. [Article]
21. Kotter, J. P., & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate Culture and Performance. The Free Press.
22. Kowal, J., & Hassel, E. A. (2010). Measuring teacher and leader performance: Cross-sector lessons for excellent evaluations. Public Impact. [Article]
23. Lutfah, A., Hariyati, N., & Handayaningrum, W. (2019). Improved teacher performance through work culture and environment. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(8), 859-863. [DOI]
24. Maryodona, M., Triwidayatsih, T., & Eddy, S. (2022). The effects of principal’s leadership and infrastructure on teacher’s performance. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 3(3), 247-257. [DOI]
25. Mastrokoukou, S., Kaliris, A., Donche, V., Chauliac, M., Karagiannopoulou, E., Christodoulides, P., & Longobardi, C. (2022). Rediscovering teaching in university: A scoping review of teacher effectiveness in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 7: 861458. [DOI]
26. Milanowski, A. (2011). Strategic measures of teacher performance. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 19-25. [DOI]
27. Molefe, G. N. (2010). Performance measurement dimensions for lecturers at selected universities: An international perspective. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(1), a243. [DOI]
28. Mulyana, Y., Chaeroni, N., Erlangga, H., Solahudin, M., Nurjaya, Sunarsi, D., Anggraeni, N., Jamalus, Masriah, I., Yuangga, K. D., & Purwanto, A. (2021). The influence of motivation, ability, organizational culture, work environment on teachers’ performance. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(7), 99-108. [Article]
29. Muslih, M., & Damanik, F. A. (2022). Effect of work environment and workload on employee performance. International Journal of Economics, Social Science, Entrepreneurship and Technology (IJESET), 1(1), 23-35. [Article]
30. Naseem, I., Sikander, A., Hameed, N., & Khan, R. (2012). Factors affecting employees' performance: evidence from Pakistan. Science Series Data Report, 4(6), 141-174. [Article]
31. Ng, D. T. K.; Leung, J. K. L.; Su, J.; Ng, R. C. W.; Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 137-161. [DOI]
32. Obineli, A. S. (2013). Teachers’ perception of the factors affecting job satisfaction in Ekwusigo Local Government of Anambra State, Nigeria. African Research Review, 7(4), 225-237. [DOI]
33. Orji, F. N. (2021). The influence of organizational incentives on teacher’s academic performance in university secondary school students in Rivers State. BW Academic Journal, 2021(2021), 60-67. [Article]
34. Osifila, G. I., & Abimbola, A. T. (2020). Workload and lecturers’ job satisfaction in Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(3), 416-423. [DOI]
35. Parveen, S., Sohail, M. M., Naeem, F., Azhar, Z., & Khan, S. H. (2012). Impact of office facilities and workplace milieu on employees' performance: A case study of Sargodha University. Asian Journal of Empirical Research. 2(4), 96-117. [Article]
36. Prifti, R. (2022). Self–efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 37(2), 111-125. [DOI]
37. Rahardjo, S. (2014). The effect of competence, leadership and work environment towards motivation and its impact on the performance of teacher of elementary school in Surakarta city, Central Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 3(6), 59-74. [Article]
38. Rasheed, M. I., Aslam, H. D., & Sarwar, S. (2010). Motivational issues for teachers in higher education: A critical case of IUB. Journal of Management Research, 2(2), 1-23. [DOI]
39. Rasheed, M. I., Humayon, A. A., Awan, U., & Ahmed, A. U. D. (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ motivation: An HRM challenge for public sector higher educational institutions of Pakistan (HEIs). International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 101-114. [DOI]
40. Sawchuk, S. (2015, September 03). Teacher evaluation: An issue overview. Education Week. [Article]
41. Selpiyani, L., Lian, B., & Putra, A. Y. (2021). The effect of workplace discipline and working conditions on teacher performance at MTS Negeri 2 OKU Timur. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education Universitas PGRI Palembang (INCoEPP 2021), 1281-1285. [DOI]
42. Setyaningsih, S., & Sukono, S. (2022). Analysis of factors affecting lecturer performance at a university during the COVID-19 pandemic using logistic regression and genetic algorithms. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(2), 542-561. [DOI]
43. Silva, S.; Fernandes, J.; Peres, P.; Lima, V.; & Silva, C. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of remote learning during the pandemic: A case study. Education Sciences, 12(10), 698. [DOI]
44. Sirait, D., Suriansyah, Ngadimun, Suhaimi. (2021). The influence of principal transformational leadership, work culture and work environment on teacher performance in state senior high schools throughout Banjarbaru city. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy 5(12), 391-400. [Article]
45. Sogoni, E. C. (2017). Influence of work environment on teacher performance in public secondary schools: a case study of Bungoma South Sub County, Kenya [Master's dissertation, University of Nairobi]. [Article]
46. Ujir, H., Salleh, S. F., Marzuki, A. S. W., Hashim, H. F., Alias, A. A. (2020). Teaching workload in 21st century higher education learning setting. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 221-227. [DOI]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
