1. Aldieri, L., Kotsemir, M. N., & Vinci, C. P. (2018). Knowledge spillover effects: Empirical evidence from Russian regions. Quality & Quantity, 52(5), 2111-2132. [DOI]

2. Almeida, A., Figueiredo, A., & Rui Silva, M. (2011). From concept to policy: Building regional innovation systems in follower regions. European Planning Studies, 19(7), 1331-1356. [DOI]

3. Antonelli, C. (2003). Knowledge complementarity and fungeability: Implications for regional strategy. Regional Studies, 37(6-7), 595-606. [DOI]

4. Anttiroiko, A. V. (2009). Making of an Asia-Pacific high-technology hub: Reflections on the large-scale business site development projects of the Osaka city and the Osaka prefecture. Regional Studies, 43(5), 759-769. [DOI]

5. Asgari, A., Khorsandi Taskoh, A., Ghiasi Nodooshan, S., Ghazinoori, S. S., & Khayyatian Yazdi, M. S. (2021). Defining the concept and providing a model for the implementation of innovation districts: A meta-synthesis analysis using text-mining. Rahyaft, 31(81), 21-41. [DOI]

6. Asgari, A., Korsandi Taskoh, A. & Ghiasi Nodooshan, S. (2020). Implementing an innovation district with the aim of regional development under the anchor approach using the fourth generation university. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 12(3), 67-81. [Article]

7. Battaglia, A., & Tremblay, D. G. (2011). 22@ and the innovation district in Barcelona and Montreal: A process of clustering development between urban regeneration and economic competitiveness. Urban Studies Research, 2011, Article ID 568159. [DOI]

8. Blakely, E. J., & Hu, R. W. (2019). Crafting Innovative Places for Australia’s Knowledge Economy. Palgrave Macmillan: Springer.

9. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2010). Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (pp. 31-57). SAGE Publications, Ltd.

10. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple helix, quadruple helix and quintuple helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 41-69. [DOI]

11. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2019). Mode 1, mode 2, and mode 3: Triple helix and quadruple Helix. Smart Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems (pp. 17-30). Springer. [DOI]

12. Carrillo, F. J., Yigitcanlar, T., García, B., & Lӧnnqvist, A. (2014). Knowledge and the City: Concepts, Applications and Trends of Knowledge-Based Urban Development. Routledge.

13. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. SAGE Publications.

14. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

15. Cosgrave, E., Arbuthnot, K., & Tryfonas, T. (2013). Living labs, innovation districts and information marketplaces: A systems approach for smart cities. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 668-677. [DOI]

16. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative. Prentice Hall.

17. Dijkstra, L., Poelman, H., & Veneri, P. (2019). The EU-OECD definition of a functional urban area. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2019/11, OECD Publishing. [DOI]

18. Elnadi, M., & Gheith, M. H. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention in higher education: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100458. [DOI]

19. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Guaralda, M., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2018). Evaluating place quality in innovation districts: A Delphic hierarchy process approach. Land Use Policy, 76, 471-486. [DOI]

20. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., & Guaralda, M. (2020a). Conceptual frameworks of innovation district place quality: An opinion paper. Land Use Policy, 90, 104166. [DOI]

21. Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., & Guaralda, M. (2020b). How can an enhanced community engagement with innovation districts be established? Evidence from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane. Cities, 96, 102430. [DOI]

22. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. [DOI]

23. Fernández-Esquinas, M., Merchán-Hernández, C., & Valmaseda- Andía, O. (2016). How effective are interface organizations in the promotion of university-industry links? Evidence from a regional innovation system. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(3), 424-442. [DOI]

24. Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2011). Determinants of the efficiency of regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, 45(7), 905-918. [DOI]

25. Goddard, J., Kempton, L., & Vallance, P. (2013). The civic university: Connecting the global and the local. In R. Cappello, A. Olechnicka, & G. Gorzelak (Eds.), Universities, Cities and Regions: Loci for Knowledge and Innovation Creation (pp. 43-63). Routledge.

26. Goldstein, H. A. (2010). The ‘entrepreneurial turn’ and regional economic development mission of universities. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(1), 83-109. [DOI]

27. Greco, I., & Cresta, A. (2015). A smart planning for smart city: The concept of smart city as an opportunity to re-think the planning models of the contemporary city. In O. Gervasi, B. Murgante, S. Misra, M. L. Gavrilova, A. M. A. C. Rocha, C. Torre, D. Taniar, & B. O. Apduhan (Eds.), Computational Science and Its Applications -- ICCSA 2015: 15th International Conference, Banff, AB, Canada, June 22-25, 2015, Proceedings, Part II (pp. 563-576). Springer Cham. [DOI]

28. Han, H., & Hawken, S. (2018). Introduction: Innovation and identity in next-generation smart cities. City, Culture and Society, 12, 1-4. [DOI]

29. Ho, M. H. C. (2009). How regional innovation systems play a relative competitive role within knowledge networks. European Planning Studies, 17(12), 1881-1905. [DOI]

30. Iammarino, S. (2005). An evolutionary integrated view of regional systems of innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives. European Planning Studies, 13(4), 497-519. [DOI]

31. Jafar, A., Akbari, M., & Davari, A. (2020). The effective factors on the formation of innovation clusters: The case of Sharif innovation district. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 12(1), 1-14. [Article]

32. Katz, B. J., & Wagner, J. (2014, November 12). The rise of urban innovation districts. Harvard Business Review. [Article]

33. Kuksa, I., Shtuler, I., Orlova-Kurilova, O., Hnatenko, I., & Rubezhanska, V. (2019). Innovation cluster as a mechanism for ensuring the enterprises interaction in the innovation sphere. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 41(4), 487-500. [DOI]

34. Landry, C. (2012). The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. Earthscan.

35. Lengyel, B. (2008). Tudásteremtés és ko-evolúció: az egyetem-gazdaság-kormányzat kapcsolatok globális és lokális vetületei. Lengyel B.-Lu Ovics M.(szer.) KérdHojelek a Régiók Gazdasági fejlHodésében. JATEPress, Szeged, 47–61.

36. Lenzen, D. (2015). University of the World: A Case for a World University System. Springer.

37. Lindberg, M., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2014). Quadruple helix as a way to bridge the gender gap in entrepreneurship: The case of an innovation system project in the Baltic Sea region. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(1), 94-113. [DOI]

38. Lukovics, M., & Zuti, B. (2013). Successful universities towards the improvement of regional competitiveness: “Fourth Generation” universities. MPRA Paper No. 77621. [Article]

39. Lyu, L., Wu, W., Hu, H., & Huang, R. (2019). An evolving regional innovation network: Collaboration among industry, university, and research institution in China’s first technology hub. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(3), 659-680. [DOI]

40. Maggioni, M. (2002). The location of high-tech firms and the development of innovative industrial cluster: A survey of the literature. Progetto di Ricerca di Interesse Nazionale Working paper AT2 1, 2002.

41. Maietta, O. W. (2015). Determinants of university-firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1341-1359. [DOI]

42. Miremadi, S. I. (2019). National innovation system and its role in improving science, technology and innovation policies. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 11(2), 135-154. [Article]

43. Nikina, A., & Piqué, J. M. (2016). Areas of Innovation in a Global World: Concept and Practice. International Association of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation (IASP).

44. Peschl, H., Deng, C., & Larson, N. (2021). Entrepreneurial thinking: A signature pedagogy for an uncertain 21st century. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100427. [DOI]

45. Peters, M. A. (2010). Three forms of the knowledge economy: Learning, creativity and openness. British Journal of Educational Studies, 58(1), 67-88. [DOI]

46. Pino, R. M., & Ortega, A. M. (2018). Regional innovation systems: Systematic literature review and recommendations for future research. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1463606. [DOI]

47. Pustovrh, A., Rangus, K., & Drnovšek, M. (2020). The role of open innovation in developing an entrepreneurial support ecosystem. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119892. [DOI]

48. Rabiee, M., & Rajabifard, A. (2017). Smart sustainable cities for all: A socio-spatial approach. Coordinates: A Monthly Magazine on Positioning, Navigation and Beyond. [Article]

49. Rezaeian Gharagozlo, A. R. (2013). A survey of Tehran metropolis strategies as a creative city of Iran. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 6(5), 149-158. [DOI]

50. Russo, A. P., van den Berg, L., & Lavanga, M. (2007). Toward a sustainable relationship between city and university: A stakeholdership approach. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(2), 199-216. [DOI]

51. Sarimin, M., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2012). Towards a comprehensive and integrated knowledge-based urban development model: Status quo and directions. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 3(2), 175-192. [DOI]

52. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students (5th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

53. Suominen, A., Seppänen, M., & Dedehayir, O. (2019). A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: A research agenda. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 335-360. [DOI]

54. Uyarra, E., Flanagan, K., Magro, E., Wilson, J. R., & Sotarauta, M. (2017). Understanding regional innovation policy dynamics: Actors, agency and learning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 559-568. [DOI]

55. Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 883-898. [DOI]

56. Yigitcanlar, T., & Lӧnnqvist, A. (2013). Benchmarking knowledge-based urban development performance: Results from the international comparison of Helsinki. Cities, 31, 357-369. [DOI]

57. Yigitcanlar, T., Adu-McVie, R., & Erol, I. (2020). How can contemporary innovation districts be classified? A systematic review of the literature. Land Use Policy, 95, 104595. [DOI]

58. Yigitcanlar, T., Han, H., Kamruzzaman, M., Ioppolo, G., & Sabatini-Marques, J. (2019). The making of smart cities: Are Songdo, Masdar, Amsterdam, San Francisco and Brisbane the best we could build? Land Use Policy, 88, 104187. [DOI]

59. Yun, J. J., Zhao, X., Yigitcanlar, T., Lee, D. S., & Ahn, H. (2018). Architectural design and open innovation symbiosis: Insights from research campuses, manufacturing systems, and innovation districts. Sustainability, 10(12), 4495. [DOI]

60. Zou, Y., & Zhao, W. (2014). Anatomy of Tsinghua university science park in China: Institutional evolution and assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(5), 663-674. [DOI]

61. Zuti, B., & Lukovics, M. (2015). “Fourth generation” universities and regional development. In R. Hamm, & J. Kopper (Eds.), Higher education institutions and regional development: proceedings of the 3. ERSA International Workshop (pp. 14-31). Krefeld: Stünings Medien. [DOI]