Wed, Jan 22, 2025
[Archive]
Volume 1, Issue 1 (JUNE ISSUE 2020)
johepal 2020, 1(1): 120-132 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mullin S. (2020). Students’ Perceptions about a Collaboratively Designed Behaviour Improvement Policy: An Exploratory Ethnographical Study. johepal. 1(1), 120-132. doi:10.29252/johepal.1.1.120
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-37-en.html
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-37-en.html
Abstract: (4096 Views)
Prior to my appointment to the senior leadership team at a secondary school in England, the Independent Schools Inspectorate (ISI) recommended that the school must ‘ensure consistent application of sanctions in response to concerns expressed by pupils’ (Appendix A). This was an area that I was keen to address. Consistent approaches to behaviour management can enhance relationships between teachers and students, enabling foundations for lifelong learning to be formed (Collins, 2019, Haydn, 2007). This exploratory ethnographical practitioner research explores pupil perceptions of behaviour management in response to the introduction of a Behaviour Improvement Policy that was designed collaboratively by staff, pupils and parents. Analysis of the data collected through focus groups and questionnaires have led to the assertions that (a) behaviour management is more effective when the school’s policy is designed collaboratively by staff, pupils and parents; (b) successful behaviour improvement policies are dependent on school leaders being committed to ensuring its success; (c) effective outcomes occur when all stakeholders are actively involved in the implementation of the policy; (d) pupils perceive their school well-being is at an optimum when there are clear and consistent policies in place that promote positive behaviour. The purpose of my research is to evaluate pupil perceptions of the collaboratively designed Behaviour Improvement Policy, critically reflecting on my own leadership actions so that elements of practice may be transferable to other educational settings or lead to further inquiry.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
General
Received: 2020/06/2 | Accepted: 2020/06/18 | Published: 2020/06/22
Received: 2020/06/2 | Accepted: 2020/06/18 | Published: 2020/06/22
References
1. Adair, J. (2005). How to Grow Leaders: The Seven Key Principles of Effective Leadership Development. London: Kogan Page.
2. Bennett, T. (2017). Creating a Culture: How School Leaders Can Optimise Behaviour. Department for Education. Available online at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/602487/Tom_Bennett_Independent_Review_of_Behaviour_in_Schools.pdf
3. British Educational Research Association [BERA]. (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (4th ed.). London. Available online at https://www.bera.ac.uk/researchers-resources/publications/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
4. British Sociological Association [BSA] (2002). Statement of Ethical Practice for the British Sociological Association (March 2002). Available online at https://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/23902/statementofethicalpractice.pdf
5. Collins, K. (2019). Foreword. In Rhodes, I., Long, M., Moore, D., Benham-Clarke, S., Kenchington, R., Boyle, C., Ford, T., Hayes, R., & Rogers, M. (2019). Improving Behaviour in Schools: Guidance Report. UK: Education Endowment Foundation, University of Exeter. Available online at https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/37789
6. Fullan, M. (Ed.) (2003). The Moral Imperative of School Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
7. Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99-125. [DOI]
8. Gill, R. (2006). Theory and practice of leadership. Sage Publications Ltd.
9. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. [DOI]
10. Gutman, L. M., & Feinstein, L. (2008). Pupil and School Effects on Children's Well-being. London: DCSF.
11. Gutman, L. M., Brown, J., Akerman, R., & Obolenskaya, P. (2009). Well-being from Childhood to Adolescence: Risk and Protective Factors. London: DCSF.
12. Gutman, L. M., & Vorhaus, J. (2012). The Impact of Pupil Behaviour and Wellbeing on Educational Outcomes. UK: Childhood Wellbeing Research Centre, Institute of Education, University of London.
13. Gleeson, D., & Shain, F. (1999). Managing ambiguity: Between markets and managerialism - A case study of middle managers in further education. The Sociological Review, 47(3), 461-490. [DOI]
14. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing Teachers, Changing Times: Teachers’ Work and Culture in the Postmodern Age. London, New York, and Toronto: Cassell, Teachers’ College Press, and University of Toronto Press.
15. Hargreaves, D. (2007). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. The teacher training agency lecture 1996. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational Research and Evidence-based Practice, (pp. 3-17). Los Angeles: Sage.
16. Haydn, T. (2007). Managing Pupil Behaviour: Key Issues in Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge.
17. House of Lords. (2011). Behaviour and Discipline in Schools: First Report of Session 2010–11. (HC 516-I 2011). London: The Stationery Office.
18. Independent Schools Inspectorate (2016). Priory School Regulatory Compliance Inspection. Available online at: https://www.isi.net/school/priory-school-7167?results=true
19. Independent Schools Inspectorate (2019). Priory School Focused Compliance and Educational Quality Inspection Reports. Available at: https://www.isi.net/school/priory-school-7167?results=true
20. Lumby, J., & Coleman, M. (2007). Leadership and Diversity: Challenging Theory and Practice in Education. London: Sage Publications.
21. McLeod, S. A. (2018, August 05). Lev Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory. SimplyPsychology. [Article]
22. Nicol, D.J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. [DOI]
23. Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 9(1), 20-32. [DOI]
24. O’Donoghue, J. (2007). Planning Your Qualitative Research Project: An Introduction to Interpretive Research in Education. London: Routledge.
25. Piaget, J. (1959). The Language and Thought of the Child (Vol. 5). Psychology Press.
26. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort but what is the effect? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277-289. [DOI]
27. Rhodes, I., Long, M., Moore, D., Benham-Clarke, S., Kenchington, R., Boyle, C., Ford, T., Hayes, R., & Rogers, M. (2019). Improving Behaviour in Schools: Guidance Report. UK: Education Endowment Foundation, University of Exeter. Available online at https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/37789
28. School Leaving Age [online]. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/know-when-you-can-leave-school
29. Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., & Buchanan, J. (2008). Enhancing teacher education practice through professional learning conversations. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2). 215-227. [DOI]
30. Shawer, S. (2010). Communicative-based curriculum innovations between theory and practice: Implications for EFL curriculum development and student cognitive and affective change. Curriculum Journal, 21(3), 333-359. [DOI]
31. Smithson, J. (2000). Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(2), 103-119. [DOI]
32. Steer, A. (2005). Learning Behaviour: The Report of the Practitioners’ Group on School Behaviour and Discipline, London: DfES. Available online at https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5494/7/STEER-FINAL_Redacted.pdf
33. Steer, A. (2009). Learning Behaviour: Lessons Learned. A review of behaviour standards and practices in our schools, Nottingham, UK: DCSF.
34. Stephens, T. (2013) A realistic evaluation of the behaviour policy in a secondary school. PhD Thesis. University of Birmingham. Available at: https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/4229/1/Stevens13EdPsychD.pdf
35. Thornberg, R. (2009). The moral construction of the good pupil embedded in school rules. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 4(3), 245-261. [DOI]
36. Troman, G. (1996). The rise of the new professionals? The restructuring of primary teachers’ work and professionalism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(4), 473 -487. [DOI]
37. Troman, G., & Woods, P. (2000). Careers nder stress: Teacher adaptations at a time of intensive reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(3), 253-275. [DOI]
38. UCU (2013). Continuing Professional Development: Classroom Management. Birmingham. Available online at https://cpd.web.ucu.org.uk/files/2013/07/CPD-factsheet-6.pdf
39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Woods, P., Jeffrey, B., Troman, G., & Boyle, M. (1997). Restructuring Schools; Reconstructing Teachers: Responding To Change In The Primary School. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
