Thu, Nov 21, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 4, Issue 1 (MARCH ISSUE 2023)
johepal 2023, 4(1): 64-82 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Harbour C P, Killam R, Wolgemuth J R. (2023). Affect Theory and the Community College Completion Agenda. johepal. 4(1), 64-82. doi:10.52547/johepal.4.1.64
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-310-en.html
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-310-en.html
Abstract: (1508 Views)
In this article we offer a critique of the 2012 landmark policy report, Reclaiming the American Dream, published by the American Association of Community Colleges. Reclaiming the American Dream is a critical policy document that advances the Completion Agenda, a policy, national in scope, that advocates for the organizational and cultural changes needed to improve completion rates. Because American community colleges have notoriously low completion rates, the Completion Agenda is a critically important policy currently impacting these institutions. The critique presented is grounded in the mobilities of policy literature and incorporates recent research and scholarship regarding affect theory. States, institutions and companies appeal to affect in advancing policies and priorities. However, scholars have only recently begun to explain how affect works as a factor in mobilizing policy. Our critique shows how an understanding of affect, as integral to the mobility of policy, illuminates and explains the manner in which the Completion Agenda is being transmitted to community colleges and also how community college presidents are pressured to support the implementation of this policy at their institutions.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2022/10/30 | Accepted: 2023/03/3 | Published: 2023/03/31
Received: 2022/10/30 | Accepted: 2023/03/3 | Published: 2023/03/31
References
1. Aikens, K., & Hargis, K. (2019) Policy conflicts on the move: A ‘mobilities’ case study of neoliberal postsecondary policy. Journal of Education Policy, 34(1), 22-43. [DOI]
2. American Association of Community Colleges. (2012). Reclaiming the American Dream: Community Colleges and the Nation’s Future. American Association of Community Colleges. [Article]
3. Anderson, B. (2016). Encountering Affect: Capacities, Apparatuses, Conditions. Routledge.
4. Apple, M. W. (2019). On doing critical policy analysis. Educational Policy. 33(1), 276-287. [DOI]
5. Ayers, D. F. (2005). Neoliberal ideology in community college mission statements: A critical discourse analysis. The Review of Higher Education, 28, 527-549. [DOI]
6. Ayers, D. F. (2015). Credentialing structures, pedagogies, practices, and curriculum goals: Trajectories of change in community college mission statements. Community College Review, 43(2), 191-214. [DOI]
7. Ayers, D. F. & Palmadessa, A. (2014.). The community college and a rising global imaginary: An analysis of practical reasoning, 1950-2013. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(6), 864-892. [DOI]
8. Bailey, T. R., Jaggars, S., & Jenkins, D. (2015). Redesigning America’s Community Colleges: A Clearer Path to Student Success. Harvard University Press.
9. Baldwin, C. (2017). The Completion Agenda in Community Colleges: What It Is, Why It Matters, and Where It’s Going. Rowman & Littlefield.
10. Ball, S. J. (2016). Following policy: networks, network ethnography and education policy mobilities. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 549-566. [DOI]
11. Bensimon, E. M., Dowd, A. C., Longanecker, D., & Witham, K. (2012). We have goals. Now what? Change, 44(6), 14-25. [DOI]
12. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Duke University Press.
13. Bragg, D. D., & Durham, B. (2012). Perspectives on access and equity in the era of (Community) College Completion. Community College Review, 40(2), 106-125. [DOI]
14. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Zone Books.
15. Busch, L. (2017). Knowledge for Sale: The Neoliberal Takeover of Higher Education. The MIT Press.
16. Cahill, D., & Konings, M. (2017). Neoliberalism. Polity Press.
17. Cohen, A., Brawer, F., & Kisker, C. B. (2014). The American Community College. Jossey Bass.
18. Dougherty, K. J. (1994). The Contradictory College. State University of New York Press.
19. Eells, W. C. (1931). The Junior College. Houghton Mifflin Company.
20. Fink, J., & Jenkins, D. (2017). Takes two to tango: Essential practices of highly effective transfer partnerships. Community College Review, 45(4), 294-310. [DOI]
21. Ford Foundation. (2008). Bridges to Opportunity for Underprepared Adults: A State Policy Guide for Community College Leaders. Ford Foundation. [Article]
22. Fraser, N., & Jaeggi, R. (2018). Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory. Polity.
23. Gándara, D. (2019). Does evidence matter? An analysis of evidence use in performance-funding policy design. The Review of Higher Education, 42(3), 991-1022. [DOI]
24. Gilbert, C. K., & Heller, D. E. (2013). Access, equity, and community colleges: The Truman Commission and federal higher education policy from 1947 to 2011. The Journal of Higher Education 84(3), 417-443. [DOI]
25. Goldin, C. D., & Katz, L. F. (2008). The Race between Education and Technology. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
26. Grubb, W. N., & Lazerson, M. (2004). The Education Gospel: The Economic Power of Schooling. Harvard University Press.
27. Harbour, C. P. (2006). The incremental marketization and centralization of state control of public higher education: A hermeneutic interpretation of legislative and administrative texts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 35-54. [DOI]
28. Harbour, C. P. (2015). John Dewey and the Future of Community College Education. Bloomsbury.
29. Harbour, C. P., & Bower, B. L. (2020). Community colleges in the Anthropocene: A philosophical justification for campus climate action plans. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(1), 6-14. [DOI]
30. Harbour, C. P., & Smith, D. A. (2016). The completion agenda, community colleges, and civic capacity. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(2), 100-112. [DOI]
31. Harbour, C. P., & Wolgemuth, J. R. (2013). Giorgio Agamben and the Abandonment Paradigm: A new form of student diversion in public higher education. Review of Higher Education (36)2, 235-254. [DOI]
32. Hsu, H. (2019, March 25). Affect Theory and the new age of anxiety: How Lauren Berlant’s cultural criticism predicted the Trumping of politics. The New Yorker. [Article]
33. Judis, J. B. (2016). The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics. Columbia Global Reports.
34. Konings, M. (2018). The Emotional Logic of Capitalism. Stanford University Press.
35. Lester, J. (2014). The completion agenda: The unintended consequences for equity in community colleges. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 29, pp. 423-466). Springer. [DOI]
36. Levin, J. S. (2017). Community Colleges and New Universities under Neoliberal Pressures. Palgrave Macmillan.
37. Levin, J. S., & Aliyeva, A. (2015). Embedded neoliberalism within faculty behaviors. The Review of Higher Education, 38(4), 537-563. [DOI]
38. Levin, J. S., Martin, M. C., López Damián, A. I., & Hoggatt, M. J. (2018). Preservation of community college logic: Organizational responses to state policies and funding practices in three states. Community College Review, 46(2), 197-220. [DOI]
39. Levin, J. S., & Montero-Hernandez, V. (2009). Community Colleges and Their Students: Co-construction and Organizational Identity. Palgrave MacMillan.
40. Li, A. Y. (2020). Performance funding policy impacts on STEM degree attainment. Educational Policy 34(2), 312-349. [DOI]
41. Li, A. Y., & Kennedy, A. I. (2018). Performance funding policy effects on community college outcomes: Are short-term certificates on the rise? Community College Review, 46(1), 3-39. [DOI]
42. McKenzie, M. (2017). Affect theory and policy mobility: Challenges and possibilities for critical policy research. Critical Studies in Education 58(2), 187-204. [DOI]
43. McKenzie, M., & Aikens, K. (2021). Global education policy mobilities and subnational policy practice. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(3), 311-325. [DOI]
44. Mounk, Y. (2018). The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger & How to Save It. Harvard University Press.
45. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313-345. [DOI]
46. Opportunity America. (2018). Work, Skills, Community: Restoring Opportunity for the Working Class. The Brookings Institution and the American Enterprise Institute.
47. Palmer, J. (2013). State fiscal support for community colleges. In J. S. Levin & S. T. Kater, (Eds.), Understanding Community Colleges (pp. 171-183). Routledge.
48. Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 773-797. [DOI]
49. Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41, 169-174. [DOI]
50. Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015). Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. University of Minnesota Press.
51. Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2012). Neoliberalism resurgent? Market rule after the great recession. South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(2), 265-288. [DOI]
52. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-first Century. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
53. Rapoport, A. (2015). Challenges and opportunities: Resocialization as a framework for global citizenship education. In J. Zajda (Ed.). Globalization, Ideology and Politics of Education Reforms. (pp. 11-23). Springer. [DOI]
54. Sellar, S. (2015). A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 131-146. [DOI]
55. Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary Affects. Duke University Press.
56. Trigg, S. (2014). Introduction: Emotional histories—beyond the personalization of the past and the abstraction of Affect Theory. Exemplaria, 26(1), 3-15. [DOI]
57. Vaughan, G. B. (1985). Maintaining open access and comprehensiveness. New Directions for Community Colleges, 1985(52), 17-28. [DOI]
58. Westheimer, J. (2019). Civic education and the rise of populist nationalism. Peabody Journal of Education, 94(1), 4-16. [DOI]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
