Volume 3, Issue 4 (DECEMBER ISSUE 2022)                   johepal 2022, 3(4): 83-105 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Gedifew M T, Muluneh G S. (2022). A Learning Culture in Public Universities: Improving Institutions’ Adaptive Capacity for Changes. johepal. 3(4), 83-105. doi:10.52547/johepal.3.4.83
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-280-en.html
Abstract:   (1492 Views)
Universities are working in an ever-changing dynamic world. To facilitate and appreciate innovation, to anticipate and adapt to the dynamics of the changing environment, institutions are encouraged to build a learning culture. Institution’s change capacity is significantly determined by learning culture; thus, the major purpose of study was to examine the learning culture of universities based on staff and academic leaders’ opinions and practices. Governed by a pragmatism perspective sequential mixed method design was used. Since learning culture is a composite variable, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) methodology, mainly Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM) was followed. Consequently, the learning culture of universities was found inadequate. It doesn’t sufficiently reflect a learning culture quality to the required level. The universities cultures do not show empowerment, inquire and dialogue, continuous learning, team learning and other important learning culture characteristics appropriately. Thus, universities are recommended to revisit their system and build professional learning communities (PLCs) by creating multiple learning opportunities, particularly inquiry and dialogue. Concurrently, their system should appreciate, recognize, and reward learning and change. Similarly, barriers to learning need to be discussed and addressed collaboratively.
Full-Text [PDF 1796 kb]   (881 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/07/12 | Accepted: 2022/11/27 | Published: 2022/12/31

References
1. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2014). The experience of learning in space and time. Prometheus, 32(1), 83-91. [DOI]
2. Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2005). Organizational learning culture, learning transfer climate and perceived innovation in Jordanian organizations. International Journal of Training and Development, 9(2), 96-109. [DOI]
3. Benson, J., & Hagtvet, K. A. (1996). The interplay among design, data analysis, and theory in the measurement of coping. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, application (pp. 83-106). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Pearson Education.
5. Cataldo, R. (2016). Developments in PLS-PM for the building of a system of composite indicators. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Naples Federico II]. [Article]
6. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
7. Cullen, K. L., Edwards, B. D., Casper, W. C., & Gue, K. R. (2014). Employees’ adaptability and perceptions of change-related uncertainty: Implications for perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 269-280. [DOI]
8. Esposito Vinzi, V., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS path modeling: From foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 47–82). Springer. [DOI]
9. Feilzer, M. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6-16. [DOI]
10. Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (7th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
11. Gebremeskel, H. H. (2018). The views of Bahir Dar University academic leaders on the role of organizational culture in implementing management innovations. Bahir Dar Journal of Education, 18(1), 48-73. [DOI]
12. Haftu, H. G. (2018). The views of Bahir Dar University academic leaders on the role of organizational culture in implementing management innovations. Bahir Dar j educ, 18(1), 48-73.
13. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares Structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd. ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
14. Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2013). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
15. Heifetz, R. A., Linsky, M., & Grashow, A. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press.
16. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405-431. [DOI]
17. Hock, C., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). Management of multi-purpose stadiums: Importance and performance measurement of service interfaces. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 14(2-3), 188-207. [DOI]
18. Holton, E. F., III. (2005). Holton’s evaluation model: New evidence and construct elaborations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(1), 37-54. [DOI]
19. Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115. [DOI]
20. James, D., & Biesta, G. (Eds) (2007). Improving learning cultures in further education. RoutledgeFalmer.
21. Joo, B. (2007) The impact of contextual and personal characteristics on employee creativity in Korean firms (UMI No. 3263468). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
22. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
23. Kotter, J. P., & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. Free Press.
24. Lee, A. V., Vargo, J., & Seville, E., (2013). Developing a tool to measure and compare organizations’ resilience. Natural Hazards Review, 14(1), 29-41. [DOI]
25. Liu, Y. (2009). Analysis and evaluation of organizational change approaches. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(12), 234-238. [DOI]
26. Marshall, S. (2010). Change, technology and higher education: Are universities capable of organizational change? ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 18(3), 179-192. [DOI]
27. Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: The dimensions of learning organizations questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132-151. [DOI]
28. Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64-74. [DOI]
29. Matebie, T. G., & Girma, S. M. (2021). Building a change adaptive university: A system of composite indicators to measure and facilitate pervasive changes. Higher Education Quarterly, 75(2), 227-246. [DOI]
30. Melu, A. (2016). Brief assessment of higher education governance in Ethiopia: Reflection on the leap of the decade. Journal of Higher Education in Africa, 14(2), 107-126. [Article]
31. Nonaka, I. (2007, July-August). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review. [Article]
32. OECD (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and User Guide. [Article]
33. Patnaik, B., Beriha, G. S., Mahapatra, S. S., & Sigh, N. (2013). Organizational learning in educational settings (technical): An Indian perspective. The Learning Organization, 20(2), 153-172. [DOI]
34. Rebelo, T., & Gomes, A. D. (2009). Different types of organization, different cultural orientations towards learning: What factors explain this? In K. A. Fanti (Ed.), Applying psychological research to understand and promote the well-being of clinical and non-clinical populations (pp. 175–186). ATINER.
35. Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332-344. [DOI]
36. Sanchez, G. (2013). Pls path modeling with R. [Article]
37. Schein, E. H. (2010). The learning culture and the learning leader. In G. R. Hickman (ed.). Leading organizations: Perspective for a new era. (2nd ed.) (pp. 331-344). SAGE Publications, Inc.
38. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday.
39. Song, J. H., Joo, B. K., & Chermack, T. J. (2009). The dimensions of learning organization questionnaire (DLOQ): A validation study in a Korean context. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(1), 43-64. [DOI]
40. Teferra, D. (2014, July 18). ‘Organised anarchy’— The enduring paradigm of university management. University World News. [Article]
41. Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). An organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567-582. [DOI]
42. Walker, A. D. (2010). Building and leading learning cultures. Hong Kong: The Joseph Lau Luen Hung Charitable Trust Asia Pacific Centre for Leadership and Change, Hong Kong Institute of Education. [Article]
43. Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1997). Dimensions of the learning organization. Warwick, RI: Partners for the Learning Organization.
44. Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2003). Summing up: Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 129-131. [DOI]
45. Yang, B., Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2004). The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 31-55. [DOI]
46. Yizengaw, T. (2003). Transformations in higher education: Experiences with reform and expansion in Ethiopian higher education system. In Keynote speech 50 presented at the Africa regional training conference entitled Improving Tertiary Education in Sub Saharan Africa: Things that Work (pp. 23-25).
47. Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(2), 81-93. [DOI]
48. Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 763-771. [DOI]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb