Fri, Apr 19, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 3, Issue 4 (DECEMBER ISSUE 2022)
johepal 2022, 3(4): 135-141 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Chew Y, Mohamed Zainal S R. (2022). Building a Resilient Change-Oriented Virtual Leadership Framework for the Higher Education Sector: A Narrative Review. johepal. 3(4), 135-141. doi:10.52547/johepal.3.4.135
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-284-en.html
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-284-en.html
Abstract: (1638 Views)
- The Covid-19 pandemic has forced many institutions to convert to the virtual work model in the blink of an eye, protecting the health of students and employees while maintaining digital productivity.
- Many pedagogues in higher education institutions reported that their remote work experience during the pandemic lacked leadership support and training, especially in the areas of information technology competencies.
- This issue clearly indicates that leadership and management were unprepared to deal with virtual transformation when the dynamic external influence calls for a virtual change.
- This paper uses a narrative review method to explore the historical context of telecommuting and critically review the development of virtual leadership literature in higher education, which finally leads to formation of a comprehensive virtual leadership conceptual framework that could be utilised in future research.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2022/06/23 | Accepted: 2022/11/12 | Published: 2022/12/31
Received: 2022/06/23 | Accepted: 2022/11/12 | Published: 2022/12/31
References
1. Alward, E., & Phelps, Y. (2019). Impactful leadership traits of virtual leaders in higher education. Online Learning, 23(3), 72-93. [DOI]
2. Arnold, D., & Sangrà, A. (2018). Dawn or dusk of the 5th age of research in educational technology? A literature review on (e-)leadership for technology-enhanced learning in higher education (2013-2017). International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher, 15, 24, 1-29. [DOI]
3. Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (2003). Adding the" E" to e-leadership: How it may impact your leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 325-338. [DOI]
4. Brabazon, T. (2007). The university of Google: Education in the (post) information age. Routledge. [DOI]
5. Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1938, 1-21. [DOI]
6. Eisenberg, J., Glikson, E., & Lisak, A. (2021). Multicultural virtual team performance: The impact of media choice and language diversity. Small Group Research, 52(5), 507-534. [DOI]
7. Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230-235. [DOI]
8. Helmold, M. (2021). New work, transformational and virtual leadership: Lessons from COVID-19 and other crises. Springer Cham. [DOI]
9. McKinsey & Company (2008). Enduring Ideas: The 7-S Framework. McKinsey Quarterly, March 1. [Article]
10. Nilles, J. M. (1976). The telecommunications-transportation tradeoff: Options for tomorrow. John Wiley & Sons.
11. Peters, T., & R.H., Waterman, Jr. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best- run companies. Harper & Row.
12. Sathithada, K., & Niramitchainont, P. (2019). Scenarios of a sustainable e-leadership for Thai higher educational institution leaders in 2027. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 10(1), 81-90. [DOI]
13. Trenerry, B., Chng, S., Wang, Y., Suhaila, Z. S., Lim, S. S., Lu, H. Y., & Oh, P. H. (2021). Preparing workplaces for digital transformation: An integrative review and framework of multi-level factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 620766. [DOI]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
