Thu, Apr 25, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 2, Issue 4 (DECEMBER ISSUE 2021)
johepal 2021, 2(4): 7-25 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rezai-Rashti G, Zhang B, Abdmolaei S, Segeren A. (2021). A Critical Policy Analysis of the Ontario Equity and Inclusive Strategy: The Dynamics of Non-Performativity. johepal. 2(4), 7-25. doi:10.52547/johepal.2.4.7
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-149-en.html
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-149-en.html
Abstract: (4131 Views)
Institutions of higher education across Ontario are increasingly expressing their commitments to diversity and inclusion through the development of various initiatives, including the implementation of policies that elucidate institutional promises of equity. Few studies have examined such policy efforts in Canadian higher education, but we suggest that insights into school board policies can help to inform a critical analysis of equity policies in universities. This paper is part of a larger project that investigates the enactment of Ontario’s equity and inclusive education strategy across all school boards in the province. In 2009, the Ontario government mandated all 72 school boards to develop a policy on equity and inclusive education. Drawing on theories of critical policy analysis, this paper provides an analysis of the policies drafted by eight school boards in southwestern Ontario during 2019-2020. Our analysis suggests that these policies largely follow verbatim transcriptions of the Ontario Ministry of Education’s equity policy, and fail to construct localized policies that include procedures, enactment strategies, and evaluation methods that respond to existing challenges within each local context. Drawing on the work of Sara Ahmed (2012), and based on our review of policy documents, our analysis suggests that equity policies function to protect the institution and its image rather than challenging institutional inequities. Ultimately, we argue that these policies are “non-performative” and fail to address systemic inequities in the education system. The implications of this for higher education will be discussed.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2021/10/6 | Accepted: 2021/12/23 | Published: 2021/12/30
Received: 2021/10/6 | Accepted: 2021/12/23 | Published: 2021/12/30
References
1. Ahmed, S. (2006). The nonperformativity of antiracism. Meridians, 7(1), 104-126.
2. Ahmed, S. (2012a). On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3. Ahmed, S. (2016). How not to do things with words. Wagadu: A Journal of Transnational Women’s and Gender Studies, 16, 1-10.
4. Ahmed. S. (2007). ‘You end up doing the document rather than doing the doing’: Diversity, race equality and the politics of documentation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(4), 590-609. [DOI]
5. Anderson, S. E., & Ben Jaafar, S. (2003). Policy trends in Ontario education 1990-2003. ICEC Working Paper #1, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto. Available online at http://fcis.oise.utoronto.ca/~icec/policytrends.pdf [Article]
6. Apple, M. W. (2019). On doing critical policy analysis. Educational Policy, 33(1), 276-287. [DOI]
7. Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(2), 10-17. [DOI]
8. Ball, S. J. (1998). Big policies/small world: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy. Comparative Education, 34(2), 119-130. [DOI]
9. Campbell, C. (2021). Educational equity in Canada: The case of Ontario’s strategies and actions to advance excellence and equity for students. School Leadership & management, 41(4-5), 409-428. [DOI]
10. Cepin, J., & Naimi, K. (2015). (Non)construction of the teacher: An inquiry into Ontario’s equity and inclusive education strategy. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 61(1), 65-79. [DOI]
11. Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99-112. [DOI]
12. de Leeuw, S., Greenwood, M., & Lindsay, N. (2013). Troubling good intentions. Settler Colonial Studies, 3(3-04), 381-394. [DOI]
13. Diem, S., Young, M, D., & Sampson, C. (2019). Where critical policy meets the politics of education: An introduction. Educational Policy, 33(1), 3-15. [DOI]
14. George, R. C., Maier, R., & Robson, K. (2020). Ignoring race: A comparative analysis of education policy in British Columbia and Ontario. Race Ethnicity and Education, 23(2), 159-179. [DOI]
15. Hargreaves, A., Shirley, D., Wangia, S., Bacon, C., & D’Angelo, M. (2018). Leading from the middle: Spreading learning, wellbeing, and identity across Ontario. Available online at https://opsoa.org/application/files/9015/2699/8653/Leading_From_the_Middle_Final.pdf [Article]
16. Joshee, R. (2007). Opportunities for social justice work: The Ontario diversity policy web. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations, 18(1&2), 171-199.
17. Kempf, A. (2018). The challenges of measuring wellbeing in schools: A review prepared for the Ontario Teachers’ Federation. Available online at https://www.otffeo.on.ca/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/The-challenges-of-measuring-wellbeing-in-schools-Winter-2017-web.pdf [Article]
18. Kimura, M. (2014). Non-performativity of university and subjectification of students: The question of equality and diversity in UK universities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(4), 523-540. [DOI]
19. Lingard, B, Martino, W, Rezai-Rashti, G & Sellar, S. (2016). Globalizing educational accountabilities, New York & London: Routledge.
20. Lipman, P. (2004). High Stakes Education: Inequality, Globalization, and Urban School Reform. New York: RoutlegeFalmer.
21. Lourie, M. (2015). Symbolic policy and the educational myth of biculturalism. Knowledge Cultures, 3(5), 49-60.
22. MacDonald-Vemic, A., & Portelli, J. (2020). Performance power: The impact of neoliberalism on social justice educators’ ways of speaking about their educational practice. Critical Studies in Education, 61(3), 296-312. [DOI]
23. Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2012). Neoliberal accountability and the politics of boys’ underachievement: Steering policy by numbers in the Ontario context. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(4), 423-440. [DOI]
24. Martino, W., & Rezai-Rashti, G. (2013). ‘Gap talk’ and the global rescaling of educational accountability in Canada. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 589-611. [DOI]
25. McPherson, K. (2020). Black girls are not magic; they are human: Intersectionality and inequity in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) schools. Curriculum Inquiry, 50(2), 149-167. [DOI]
26. Ontario Ministry of Education. (1993). Policy/Program memorandum No. 119: Antiracism and ethnocultural equity in school boards: Guidelines for policy development and implementation.
27. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2009). Policy/Program memorandum No. 119: Developing and implementing equity and inclusive education policies in Ontario schools. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
28. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2014). Achieving excellence: A renewed vision for education in Ontario. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Available online at https://www.oise.utoronto.ca/atkinson/UserFiles/File/Policy_Monitor/ON_01_04_14_-_renewedVision.pdf [Article]
29. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). Ontario’s wellbeing strategy for education: Discussion document. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Available online at https://collections.ola.org/mon/30005/334837.pdf [Article]
30. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2017). Ontario’s education equity action plan. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Available online at http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/about/education_equity_plan_en.pdf [Article]
31. Rezai-Rashti, G. (2003). Equity education and educational restructuring in Ontario: Global and local policy and practice. World Studies in Education, 4(1), 29-44.
32. Rezai-Rashti, G., & Lingard, B. (2021). Test-based accountability, standardized testing and minority/racialized students’ perspectives in urban schools in Canada and Australia. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 42(5), 716-731. [DOI]
33. Rezai-Rashti, G., Segeren, A., & Martino, W. (2017). The new articulation of equity education in neoliberal times: The changing conception of social justice in Ontario. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 15(2), 160-174. [DOI]
34. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing Education Policy. London: Routledge.
35. Savage, G. C., Sellar, S., & Gorur, R. (2013). Equity and marketisation: Emerging policies and practices in Australian education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), 161-169. [DOI]
36. Segeren, A. L. (2016). How schools enact equity policies: A case study of social justice leadership (4137). [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario]. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository.
37. Segeren, A., & Kutsyuruba, B. (2012). Twenty years and counting: An examination of the development of equity and inclusive education policy in Ontario (1990-2010). Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 136. [Article]
38. Shaker, E. (2019). The damage done: Neoliberalism’s broken record on education. The Monitor. Available online at https://monitormag.ca/articles/the-damage-done-neoliberalisms-broken-record-on-education [Article]
39. Shewchuk, S., & Cooper, A. (2018). Exploring equity in Ontario: A provincial scan of equity policies across school boards. Canadian Journal of Education, 41(4), 917-953. [Article]
40. Spratt, J. (2017). Wellbeing, Equity and Education: A Critical Analysis of Policy Discourses of Wellbeing in Schools. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
