Volume 6, Issue 3 (SEPTEMBER ISSUE 2025)                   johepal 2025, 6(3): 8-23 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Anuik J, Kanuka H. (2025). “It’s as Long as a Piece of String!” Definitions of Canadian U15 Faculty at Midcareer. johepal. 6(3), 8-23. doi:10.61882/johepal.6.3.8
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-1426-en.html
“It’s as Long as a Piece of String!” Definitions of Canadian U15 Faculty at Midcareer
Jonathan Anuik *, Heather Kanuka
Abstract:   (635 Views)
The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of how midcareer should be defined in academia. To determine when academics enter and exit midcareer, we sent out an open-ended survey to deans, directors, and chairs in research-based universities across Canada (N=242). The survey findings revealed an understanding that the midcareer phase starts immediately or shortly following the tenure award (and, usually, promotion to associate professor), and one stays in the midcareer phase past the promotion to full professor. Our survey data also showed good agreement that one exits midcareer when one winds down research or achieves a notable recognition for careerlong work. Within midcareer, most respondents agree that there is an expectation for enhancement of one’s research and service profile and to lead formally and informally in the university, the scholarly profession, and the community. Although increase in research output is an expectation, in the domain of research, there is a requirement that faculty recruit, retain, and mentor upcoming researchers (graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and junior faculty). These achievements are not measured finely but constitute important milestones in the midcareer phase.
Keywords: Midcareer, Faculty, Higher Education, Universities, HR Trends & Policies, Canadian Higher Education
Full-Text [PDF 1318 kb]   (416 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2025/03/14 | Accepted: 2025/09/12 | Published: 2025/09/30
References
1. Baldwin, R. G. (1990). Faculty career stages and implications for professional development. In J. H. Schuster, D. W. Wheeler, & Associates (Eds.), Enhancing faculty careers: Strategies for development and renewal (pp. 20-40). Jossey-Bass.
2. Baldwin, R. G., & Chang, D. A. (2006). Reinforcing our strategies to support faculty in the middle years of academic life. Liberal Education, (Fall), 28-35. [Article]
3. Baldwin, R. G., Lunceford, C. J., & VanderLinden, K. E. (2005). Faculty in the middle years: Illuminating an overlooked phase of academic life. The Review of Higher Education, 29(1), 97-118. [DOI]
4. Baldwin, R., DeZure, D., Shaw, A., & Moretto, K. (2008). Mapping the terrain of mid-career faculty at a research university: Implications for faculty and academic leaders. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 40(5), 46-55. [DOI]
5. Bentley, P. J., & Kyvik, S. (2013). Individual differences in faculty research time allocations across 13 countries. Research in Higher Education, 54(3), 329-348. [DOI]
6. Berdanier, C. G. P. (2019). Toward an engineering faculty development initiative for associate professors: Results from focus groups at an R1 institution. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1-9). [DOI]
7. Berheide, C. W., Christenson, L., Linden, R., & Bray. U. (2013). Gender differences in promotion experiences at two elite private Liberal Arts Colleges in the United States. Forum on Public Policy. [Article]
8. Bland, C. H. & Shmitz, C. C. (1988). Faculty vitality on review. Retrospect and prospect. The Journal of Higher Education, 59(2), 190-224. [DOI]
9. Boice, R. (1986). Faculty development via field programs for middle-aged, disillusioned faculty. Research in Higher Education, 25(2), 115-135. [Article]
10. Boice, R. (1993). Primal origins and later correctives for midcareer disillusionment. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 1993(55), 33-41. [DOI]
11. Brew, A., Boud, D., Crawford, K., & Lucas, L. (2018). Navigating the demands of academic work to shape an academic job. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2294-2304. [DOI]
12. Buch, K., Dulin, A., & Huet, Y. (2019). A comprehensive approach to supporting and promoting mid-career faculty. In A. G. Welch, J. Bolin, & D. Reardon (Eds.), Mid-career faculty: Trends, barriers, and possibilities (pp. 108-125). Brill Sense.
13. Byström, K., Given, L. M., Lopatovska, I., O'Brien, H., & Rorissa, A. (2016). Life after tenure: Professional development strategies for mid-career faculty. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1-4. [DOI]
14. Campion, M. A. W., Bhasin, R. M., Beaudette, D. J., Shann, M. H., & Benjamin, E. J. (2016). Mid-career faculty development in academic medicine: How does it impact faculty and institutional vitality? Journal of Faculty Development, 30(3), 49-64. [PubMed]
15. DeFelippo, A. M., & Dee, J. R. (2022). Vitality in the academic workplace: Sustaining professional growth for mid-career faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 47(4), 565-585. [DOI]
16. Eason, B. J. A. (2002). A portrait of long-term associate professors: Career, choices, and consequences (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States.
17. Gardner, S. K., & Veliz, D. (2014). Evincing the ratchet: A thematic analysis of the promotion and tenure guidelines at a striving university. The Review of Higher Education, 38(1), 105-132. [DOI]
18. Golper, T. A., & Feldman, H. I. (2008). New challenges and paradigms for mid-career faculty in academic medical centers: Key strategies for success for mid-career medical school faculty. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 3(6), 1870-1874. [DOI]
19. Helitzer, D. L., Newbill, S. L., Cardinali, G., Morahan, P. S., Chang, S., & Magrane, D. (2016). Narratives of participants in national career development programs for women in academic medicine: Identifying the opportunities for strategic investment. Journal of Women’s Health, 25(4), 360-371. [DOI]
20. Jaschik, S. (2012, June 03). Unhappy associate professors: Preliminary results of national survey find their job satisfaction in many areas lags those at assistant and full ranks. Inside Higher Ed. [Article]
21. Jellicorse, J. L., & Tilley, J. G. (1985). Promoting vitality after tenure. Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, 53(August), 65-69.
22. Kalivoda, P., Rogers Sorrell, G., & Simpson, R. D. (1994). Nurturing faculty vitality by matching institutional interventions with career-stage needs. Innovative Higher Education, 18(4), 255-272. [DOI]
23. Kanuka, H. & Anuik, J. (2021). The post-tenure apex: Unrewarding, unhappy, unproductive. Is continuing learning a remedy for the mid-career misery? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 2(1), 6-27. [DOI]
24. Karpiak, I. E. (1997). University professors at mid-life: Being a part of...but feeling apart. To Improve the Academy, 16(1), 21-40. [DOI]
25. Kenyon, T. (2020, November 02). Identifying the reason(s) behind a mid-career slump: A look at some of the research obstacles faculty may face once they have received tenure. University Affairs. [Article]
26. Lawrence, J. H., & Blackburn, R. T. (1985). Faculty careers: Maturation, demographic, and historical effects. Research in Higher Education, 22(2), 135-154. [DOI]
27. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc.
28. Ludwig, A. M. (1985). Is there life after tenure? American Journal of Psychotherapy, 39(1), 49-56. [DOI]
29. Lumpkin, A. (2014). The role of organizational culture on and career stages of faculty. The Educational Forum, 78(2), 196-205. [DOI]
30. Macfarlane B. (2007). Defining and rewarding academic citizenship: The implications for university promotions policy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(3), 261-273. [DOI]
31. Mann, M. P. (1989). An analysis of faculty goals: Personal, disciplinary, and career development decisions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Francisco, CA, March 27-31, 1989). [Article]
32. Maranville, S. (2014). Becoming a scholar: Everything I needed to know I learned on sabbatical. Higher Learning Research Communications, 4(1), 4-14. [DOI]
33. Maree, J. G. (2017). Mid-career construction counselling to instill spiritual awareness and allay fear. South African Journal of Education, 37(4), 1-10. [DOI]
34. Mathews, K. (2014). Perspectives on midcareer faculty and advice for supporting them. The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE). [Article]
35. Miller, R. I. (1988). Evaluating faculty for promotion and tenure. Jossey-Bass.
36. Nottis, K. (2005). Supporting the mid-career researcher. The Journal of Faculty Development, 20(2), 95-98. [Article]
37. O’Meara, K. A. (2004). Beliefs about post-tenure review: The influence of autonomy, collegiality, career stage, and institutional context. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(2), 178-202. [DOI]
38. Pastore, D. L. (2013). Faculty perspectives on Baldwin and Chang’s mid-career faculty development model. The Journal of Faculty Development, 27(2), 25-32. [Article]
39. Porter, A. M. (2019). Physics PhDs ten years later: Success factors and barriers in career paths. American Institute of Physics. [Article]
40. Romano, J. L., Hoesing, R., O’Donovan, K., & Weinsheimer, J. (2004). Faculty at mid-career: A program to enhance teaching and learning. Innovative Higher Education, 29(1), 21-48. [DOI]
41. Schimanski, L. A., & Alperin, J. P. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future. F1000Research, 7: 1605. [DOI]
42. Self, C. C., Geertsema-Sligh, M., & Schmitz Weiss, A. (2012). Stoking the research fire: Three views. American Journalism, 29(1), 135-144. [DOI]
43. Stortz, M. E. (2005). The seasons of a scholar's calling: Insights from mid-field. Teaching Theology & Religion, 8(1), 24-28. [DOI]
44. Terosky, A. L. P., O’Meara, K. A., & Campbell, C, M. (2014). Enabling possibility: Women associate professors’ sense of agency in career advancement. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7(1), 58-76. [DOI]
45. The Modern Language Association of America. (2009). Standing still: The associate professor survey. [Report of the Committee on the Status of Women in the Profession]. [Article]
46. Van Miegroet, H., Glass, C., Callister, R. R., & Sullivan, K. (2019). Unclogging the pipeline: Advancement to full professor in academic STEM. Equity, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38(2), 246-264. [DOI]
47. Wilson, R. (2012). Why are associate professors some of the unhappiest people in academe? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 58(38). [Article]
48. Wolfgang, A. P., Gupchup, G. V., & Plake, K. S. (1995). Relative importance of performance criteria in promotion and tenure decisions: Perceptions of pharmacy faculty members. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 59(4), 342-347. [DOI]
49. Wu, M-J., Zhao, K., & Fils-Aime, F. (2022). Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behaviors Reports, 7: 100206. [DOI]
50. Youn, T. I. K., & Price, T. M. (2009). Learning from the experience of others: The evolution of faculty tenure and promotion rules in comprehensive institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(2), 204-237. [DOI]
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb