Volume 2, Issue 3 (SEPTEMBER ISSUE 2021)                   johepal 2021, 2(3): 77-98 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ertem H Y, Aypay A. (2021). Bibliometric Review of Studies on Organizational and Administrative Dynamics in Higher Education. johepal. 2(3), 77-98. doi:10.52547/johepal.2.3.77
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-130-en.html
Abstract:   (2240 Views)
The purpose of this study is to perform bibliometric reviews of studies on organizational and administrative dynamics in higher education. A bibliometric review including 22139 studies published in journals indexed in Scopus between 1960 and 2020 was conducted. PRISMA was used to identify and select the studies in the sample. Data was analyzed using Scopus Analytic Tools, Excel functions, Tableau, and VOSviewer. There was an upward trend in the amount of the documents from 1960 to 2020. “Higher Education” was found the most influential journal on organizational and administrative dynamics in this period. Intellectual structure of knowledge base was based mainly on managerial issues, organizational issues, student outcomes, and sustainability. Further, limitations, interpretation, implications, as well as the recommendations were made based on the emerged findings of the present research.
Full-Text [PDF 1930 kb]   (786 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/08/20 | Accepted: 2021/09/27 | Published: 2021/09/30

References
1. Antonio, A. L. (2001). The role of interracial interaction in the development of leadership skills and cultural knowledge and understanding. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 593-617. [DOI]
2. Aparicio, G., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2021). A holistic bibliometric overview of the student engagement research field. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(4), 540-557. [DOI]
3. Athiyaman, A. (1997). Linking student satisfaction and service quality perceptions: The case of university education. European Journal of Marketing, 31(7), 528-540. [DOI]
4. Baldridge, J. V. (1971). Power and Conflict in the University: Research in the Sociology of Complex Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
5. Bastedo, M. N. (Ed.). (2012). The Organization of Higher Education: Managing Colleges for a New Era. USA: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. (2nd Ed.). Buckingham, UK: SRHE & Open University Press.
7. Bergquist, W. H., & Pawlak, K. (2008). Engaging the Six Cultures of the Academy: Revised and Expanded Edition of the Four Cultures of the Academy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8. Bess, J. L., & Dee, J. R. (2012a). Understanding College and University Organization: Theories for Effective Policy and Practice. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
9. Bess, J. L., & Dee, J. R. (2012b). Understanding College and University Organization: Theories of Effective Policy and Practice. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
10. Birnbaum, R. (1991). How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. (6th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
12. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179-255. [DOI]
13. Brika, S. K. M., Algamdi, A., Chergui, K., Musa, A. A., & Zouaghi, R. (2021). Quality of higher education: A bibliometric review study, Frontiers in Education. 6, 666087. [DOI]
14. Bruckmann, S., & Carvalho, T. (2018). Understanding change in higher education: An archetypal approach. Higher Education, 76(4), 629-647. [DOI]
15. Bryman, A. (2007). Effective leadership in higher education: A literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 693-710. [DOI]
16. Budd, J. M. (1988). A bibliometric analysis of higher education literature. Research in Higher Education, 28(2), 180-190. [DOI]
17. Chandler, J., Barry, J., & Clark, H. (2002). Stressing academe: The wear and tear of the new public management. Human Relations, 55(9), 1051-1069. [DOI]
18. Clark, B. C. (1972). The organizational saga in higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 178-184.
19. Cohen, M. D., & March, J. G. (1974). Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College President. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
20. Cortese, A. D. (2003). The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Planning for Higher Education, 31(3), 15-22.
21. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Daenekindt, S., & Huisman, J. (2020). Mapping the scattered field of research on higher education. A correlated topic model of 17,000 articles, 1991–2018. Higher Education, 80(3), 571-587. [DOI]
23. Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization Theory and Design. (10th ed.) USA: Cengage Learning.
24. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. [DOI]
25. Dee, J., & Leisyte, L. (2017). Knowledge sharing and organizational change in higher education. The Learning Organization. 24(5), 355-365. [DOI]
26. Deem, R. (1998). 'New managerialism' and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47-70. [DOI]
27. Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217-235. [DOI]
28. Dehdarirad, T., Villarroya, A., & Barrios, M. (2015). Research on women in science and higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103(3), 795-812. [DOI]
29. Deming, D. J., Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2012). The for-profit postsecondary school sector: Nimble critters or agile predators?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(1), 139-164. [DOI]
30. DiMaggio, P J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 1-40). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Esen, M., Bellibas, M. S., & Gumus, S. (2020). The evolution of leadership research in higher education for two decades (1995-2014): A bibliometric and content analysis. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(3), 259-273. [DOI]
32. Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The New Public Management in Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Ferrer-Balas, D., Lozano, R., Huisingh, D., Buckland, H., Ysern, P., & Zilahy, G. (2010). Going beyond the rhetoric: System-wide changes in universities for sustainable societies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 607-610. [DOI]
34. Fumasoli, T., & Stensaker, B. (2013). Organizational studies in higher education: A reflection on historical themes and prospective trends. Higher Education Policy, 26(4), 479-496. [DOI]
35. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022-1054. [DOI]
36. Güçlü, N., & Şehitoğlu, E. T. (2006). Örgütsel değişim yönetimi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 0(13), 240-254. [Article]
37. Gurin, P., Dey, E., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330-367. [DOI]
38. Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401. [DOI]
39. Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369. [DOI]
40. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929-964. [Article]
41. Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34. [DOI]
42. Henkel, M. (2000). Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education (Higher Education Policy Series 46). United Kingdom: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
43. Hesselbarth, C., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Educating change agents for sustainability–learnings from the first sustainability management master of business administration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 24-36. [DOI]
44. Huisman, J., & Tight, M. (2015). Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (Volume 1). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
45. Jackson, N. C. (2019). Managing for competency with innovation change in higher education: Examining the pitfalls and pivots of digital transformation. Business Horizons, 62(6), 761-772. [DOI]
46. Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773. [DOI]
47. Kanji, G. K., Malek, A., & Tambi, B. A. (1999). Total quality management in UK higher education institutions. Total Quality Management, 10(1), 129-153. [DOI]
48. Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2017). Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge?. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 984-998. [DOI]
49. Kwiek, M. (2021). The prestige economy of higher education journals: A quantitative approach. Higher Education, 81(3), 493-519. [DOI]
50. Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Alonso-Almeida, M., Huisingh, D., Lozano, F. J., Waas, T., Lambrechts, W., Lukman, R., & Hugé, J. (2015). A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: Results from a worldwide survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1-18. [DOI]
51. Manning, K. (2018). Organizational Theory in Higher Education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
52. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
53. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., ... & Clark, J. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9), 889-896. [DOI]
54. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. [DOI]
55. Mulà, I., Tilbury, D., Ryan, A., Mader, M., Dlouhá, J., Mader, C., Benayas, J., Dlouhý, J. & Alba, D. (2017). Catalysing change in higher education for sustainable development: A review of professional development initiatives for university educators. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(5), 798-820. [DOI]
56. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. (2020). Gross domestic product (GDP) and spending. Available online at https://data.oecd.org/gdp/gross-domestic-product-gdp.htm [Article]
57. Parker, M., & Jary, D. (1995). The McUniversity: Organization, management and academic subjectivity. Organization, 2(2), 319-338. [DOI]
58. Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to Lead in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
59. Salancik, G. R. & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 453-473. [DOI]
60. Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427-442. [DOI]
61. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
62. Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 307-326. [DOI]
63. Shattock, M. (2006). Managing Good Governance in Higher Education. England: Open University Press.
64. Snyder, T. D., & Dillow, S. A. (2014). Digest of education statistics 2012. USA: Claitors Publishing.
65. Sönmez, Ö. F. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of educational research articles published in the field of social study education based on web of science database. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 216-229. [DOI]
66. Statista (2021). The most spoken languages worldwide in 2021. Available online at https://www.statista.com/statistics/266808/the-most-spoken-languages-worldwide/ [Article]
67. Stensaker, B., Välimaa, J. & Sarrico C. (Eds). (2012). Managing Reform in Universities: The Dynamics of Culture, Identity and Organizational Change. UK: Palgrave McMillan.
68. Stephens, J. C., Hernandez, M. E., Román, M., Graham, A. C., & Scholz, R. W. (2008). Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(3), 317-338. [DOI]
69. Teichler, U. (2000). Higher education research and its institutional basis. In S. Schwarz, & U. Teichler (eds.), The Institutional Basis of Higher Education Research: Experiences and Perspectives (pp. 13-24). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [DOI]
70. Thomas, I. (2004). Sustainability in tertiary curricula: What is stopping it happening?. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 5(1), 33-47. [DOI]
71. Tight, M. (2012). Researching Higher Education (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
72. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053-1070. [DOI]
73. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1-19. [DOI]
74. Weick, K. E. (2009). Making Sense of the Organization: The Impermanent Organization (Volume 2). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
75. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355. [DOI]
76. Winter, R. (2009). Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(2), 121-131. [DOI]
77. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. [DOI]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Higher Education Policy And Leadership Studies

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb