Thu, May 14, 2026
[Archive]
Volume 6, Issue 4 (DECEMBER ISSUE 2025)
johepal 2025, 6(4): 167-182 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zarrati Z. (2025). Bridging the Gap: How K-12 Educational Policies Impact Students’ Readiness for Higher Education. johepal. 6(4), 167-182. doi:10.61882/johepal.6.4.167
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-1554-en.html
URL: http://johepal.com/article-1-1554-en.html
Abstract: (332 Views)
The K-12 educational system in Iran faces challenges in preparing students for success in higher education and beyond, including their future professional careers. This study examines whether students are solely responsible for their struggles at the higher education level, or if the current K-12 policies contribute to an environment that limits students’ potential. A total of 317 undergraduates (aged 19-23) were purposefully selected to participate in this qualitative research, with data collected through interviews. The analysis was conducted using Strauss and Corbin’s (1998) Constant Comparative methodology to explore the research question. The findings suggest that while the educational system in schools is largely test- and outcome-focused, the teaching environment does not adequately support students in developing the skills and mindset needed for success after school. Therefore, improvements in the educational system are necessary to better prepare students for their future endeavors.
Keywords: K-12 Education, Teaching Practices, Higher Education, Educational Reform, School improvement
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2025/05/21 | Accepted: 2025/11/24 | Published: 2025/12/31
Received: 2025/05/21 | Accepted: 2025/11/24 | Published: 2025/12/31
References
1. Anspal, T., Leijen, Ä., & Löfström, E. (2019). Tensions and the teacher’s role in student teacher identity development in primary and subject teacher curricula. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(5), 679-695. [DOI]
2. Ary, D. Jacobs, L.C., & Sorenson, C. (2010). Introduction to research education (8th Ed.). New York, NY: Wadswort.
3. Branch, A. J. (2020). Promoting ethnic identity development while teaching subject matter content: A model of ethnic identity exploration in education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87. 102918 [DOI]
4. Enright, R. D., Ganiere, D. M., Buss, R. R., Lapsley, D. K., & Olson, L. M. (1983). Promoting identity development in adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 3(3), 247–255. [DOI]
5. Kaplan, A., & Flum, H. (2012). Identity formation in educational settings: A critical focus for education in the 21st century. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(3), 171–175. [DOI]
6. Lannegrand-Willems, L., & Bosma, H. A. (2006). Identity development-in-context: The school as an important context for identity development. Identity, 6(1), 85–113. [DOI]
7. Morgan, H. (2014). Review of research: The education system in Finland: A success story other countries can emulate. Childhood Education, 90(6), 453-457. [DOI]
8. Palmér, H. (2016). Professional primary school teacher identity development: a pursuit in line with an unexpressed image. Teacher Development, 20(5), 682–700. [DOI]
9. Pinnegar, S. (2005). Identity development, moral authority and the teacher educator. In Hoban G. F. (eds). The Missing Links in Teacher Education Design. Self Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, (pp. 259-279). vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht [DOI]
10. Rich, Y., & Schachter, E. P. (2012). High school identity climate and student identity development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(3), 218–228. [DOI]
11. Safari, P. (2018). A critical reflection on (re)construction of my identity as an English language learner and English teacher. Professional Development in Education, 44(5), 704-720. [DOI]
12. Sahlberg, P. (2011). The professional educator: Lessons from Finland. American Educator, 35(2), 34-38. [Article]
13. Stancanelli, J. (2010). Conducting an online focus group. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 761-765.
14. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
15. Tohidian, I. (2022). Thrive beyond the schools: Three real-life skills to succeed in the society. School Rubric. [Article]
16. Tohidian, I., Khorsandi Taskoh, A., & Abbaspour, A. (2023). Urgent changes to be made in Iran’s primary education: Voices from teachers. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 485-497. [DOI]
17. Torres, V., Jones, S. R., & Renn, K. A. (2009). Identity development theories in student affairs: Origins, current status, and new approaches. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 577–596. [DOI]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
