Volume 4, Issue 4 (DECEMBER ISSUE 2023)                   johepal 2023, 4(4): 88-100 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Abstract:   (343 Views)
This case study establishes a roadmap for exploring the alignment between national OER initiatives and global standards, using the SHAMS platform as a case study within the ambit of UNESCO’s transformative educational agenda, identifying exemplary practices and areas necessitating further development. Such recommendations serve as a framework that facilitates the provision of inclusive OERs and equitable quality learning opportunities. This case study recommends strategizing OER use in the education system by envisioning ideal OER implementation processes, planning the expected impact on teachers and students, teaching strategies, curricula, and assessments. The case study highlights the importance of leadership, quality assurance, licensing and copyright protection mechanisms, content creation, policies, and access as enablers of optimal resource-sharing practices. It involves a literature review on virtual internationalization and OERs, situating the SHAMS platform within the UNESCO framework and examining its alignment with national educational strategies. By intertwining the evaluation of the SHAMS platform with UNESCO’s OER Recommendations, this case study is poised to contribute to the discourse on OER implementation, providing empirical evidence of how national platforms can operationalize international frameworks to foster a more open and scalable educational environment.
Full-Text [PDF 1665 kb]   (171 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2023/09/30 | Accepted: 2023/12/4 | Published: 2023/12/31

References
1. Beck, K. (2012). Globalization/s: Reproduction and resistance in the internationalization of higher education. Canadian Journal of Education, 35(3), 133-148. [Article]
2. Bol, L., Esqueda, M. C., Ryan, D., & Kimmel, S. C. (2022). A comparison of academic outcomes in courses taught with open educational resources and publisher content. Educational Researcher, 51(1), 17-26. [DOI]
3. Brandle, S. M. (2018). Opening up to OERs: Electronic original sourcebook versus traditional textbook in the introduction to American Government course. Journal of Political Science Education, 14(4), 535-554. [DOI]
4. D'Antoni, S. (2009). Introduction. In S. D'Antoni & C. Savage (Eds.), Open Educational Resources: Conversations in Cyberspace (pp. 17-26). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). [Article]
5. De Corte, E., Engwall, L., & Teichler, U. (Eds.) (2016). From Books to MOOCs? Emerging Models of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Portland Press Limited.
6. De Wit, H., & Hunter, F. (2015). Understanding internationalisation of higher education in the European context. In H. de Wit, F. Hunter, L. Howard, & E. Egron-Polak (Eds.), Internationalisation of Higher Education (pp. 41-58). Brussels, Belgium: European Parliament. [DOI]
7. De Wit, H., & Altbach, P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: Global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 28-46. [DOI]
8. Gao, Y., Baik, C., Arkoudis, S. (2015). Internationalization of Higher Education. In J. Huisman, H. de Boer, D. D. Dill, M. Souto-Otero (Eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance (pp. 300-320). Palgrave Macmillan. [DOI]
9. Johnstone, S. M. (2005). Open educational resources serve the world. Educause Quarterly, 28(3), 15-18. [Article]
10. Knight, J., & McNamara, J. (2017). Transnational Education: A Classification Framework and Data Collection Guidelines for International Program and Provider Mobility (IPPM). [DOI]
11. Lawton, W. (2015). Digital learning, mobility, and internationalisation in European higher education. In H. de Wit, F. Hunter, L. Howard, & E. Egron-Polak (Eds.), Internationalization of Higher Education (pp. 77-83). European Parliament. [DOI]
12. Mishra, S. (2017). Open educational resources: Removing barriers from within. Distance Education, 38(3), 369-380. [DOI]
13. NCeL. (2022). About the Saudi OER Program. [Article]
14. NCeL. (2023). SHMS - Saudi OER Network. National Center for e-Learning. [Article]
15. Ozturk, I., (2001). The role of education in economic development: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Rural Development and Administration, 33(1), 39-47. [Article]
16. Saudi Vision 2030. (2017). [Article]
17. Sheetz, D. (2009). [Review of the book The world is open: How web technology is revolutionizing education by Bonk, C. J.]. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 181. [DOI]
18. Siemens, G. (2015). Foreword #1: The role of MOOCs in the future of education. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and Open Education Around the World (pp. xiii-xvii). Routledge.
19. UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries: Final report. UNESCO. [Article]
20. UNESCO. (2005). Towards knowledge societies: UNESCO world report. UNESCO. [Article]
21. Wildavsky, B. (2015). MOOCs in the developing world: Hope or hype? International Higher Education, (80), 23-25. [DOI]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.