Volume 2, Issue 3 (SEPTEMBER ISSUE 2021)                   johepal 2021, 2(3): 100-118 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Abstract:   (3315 Views)
Service quality and students’ satisfaction have become global buzzwords in the higher education (HE) literature in the past 20 years. Research studies on service quality and its effect on students’ satisfaction in the Lebanese HE sector are still very limited. This quantitative study aims to measure quality of service provided for students at X University from students’ perspective. It also aims to assess the extent of students’ satisfaction with their educational experience at X University and investigate the effect of service quality on their satisfaction. Data were collected from 4,004 X University students across Lebanon through an online survey questionnaire adapted from the modified Higher Education Performance-only (HEDPERF) model (Abdullah, 2006b) and student exit survey (Lebanese American University, 2017). Results revealed that good quality service is provided for students, who are mainly satisfied with their educational experience at X University. The results also showed that service quality has a significant effect on students’ satisfaction, with reputation dimension as the strongest predictor of students’ satisfaction and academic aspects dimension as the weakest predictor. Limitations of the study and directions for future research are provided.
Full-Text [PDF 1667 kb]   (2325 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/07/17 | Accepted: 2021/09/20 | Published: 2021/09/30

References
1. Abdullah, F. (2006a). The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569-581. [DOI]
2. Abdullah, F. (2006b). Measuring service quality in higher education: Three instruments compared. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29(1), 71-89. [DOI]
3. Al Khattab, S., & Fraij, F. (2011). Assessing students’ satisfaction with quality of service of students information system. Management and Marketing Journal, 9(1), 111-125.
4. Algahtany, S., Almethheb, A., & Alomar, B. (2011). Research methods of behavior science with SPSS applications. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Alobecan Library.
5. Ali, S. R. O., Shariff, N. A. M., Said, N. S. M., & Mat, K. A. (2020). The effects of service quality dimensions on students’ satisfaction: Hedperf model adoption. Jurnal Intelek, 15(1), 69-76. [DOI]
6. Azam, A. (2018). Service quality dimensions and students’ satisfaction: A study of Saudi Arabian private higher education institutions. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 7(2), 275-284. [Article]
7. Banahene, S., Kraa, J. J., & Kasu, P. A. (2018). Impact of HEdPERF on students’ satisfaction and academic performance in Ghanaian universities; mediating role of attitude towards learning. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 96-119. [DOI]
8. Baniya, R. (2016). Relationship between perception of service quality and students’ satisfaction: A case study of a management school. Journal of Education and Research, 6(2), 43-64. [DOI]
9. Birhanu, A. L. (2018). Service quality and customer satisfaction in Ethiopian higher education institutions: The case of Oromia State University, Ethiopia. The International Journal of Business and Management, 6(9), 273-289.
10. Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68. [DOI]
11. de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Hoffmann Sampaio, C., & da Silva Costa, G. (2017). Student satisfaction in higher education: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1) 1-18. [DOI]
12. Dib, H., & Alnazer, M. (2013). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in Syrian universities. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 56, 12-20.
13. Essaoudi, M., & Lotfi, R. (2021). Effect of service quality on student-inspector satisfaction at the training center for educational inspectors in Rabat, Morocco. International Journal of Information Technology and Applied Sciences (IJITAS), 3(2), 53-62. [DOI]
14. Evans, J. R. (2011). Quality and performance excellence: Management, organization, and strategy (6th ed.). Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.
15. Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. (2014). Quality management for organizational excellence: Introduction to total quality (7th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson.
16. Harvey, L. (2011). The nexus of feedback and improvement. In C. S. Nair, & P. Mertova, (Eds.), Student feedback: The cornerstone to an effective quality assurance system in higher education, (pp. 3-26). Oxford: Chandos Publishing. [DOI]
17. Hasbolah, F., Kumarasamy, M. M., & Fazmi, K. N. M. (2018). Students’ perception of service quality delivery in a private higher education institution. Journal of Management, Business & Social Sciences Impact, 1, 35-43.
18. Hasrouny, A. (2011). Lebanon: Higher education at risk without reform. University World News, 155, https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20110122084153924 [Article]
19. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning: With applications in R. New York: Springer.
20. Kajenthiran, K., & Karunanithy, M. (2015). Service quality and student satisfaction: A case study of private external higher education institutions in Jaffna, Sri Lanka. Journal of Business Studies, 1(2), 46-64.
21. Khattab, F. (2018). Developing a service quality model for private higher education institutions in Lebanon. Journal of Management and Marketing Review, 3(1), 24-33.
22. Lazibat, T., Baković, T., & Dužević, I. (2014). How perceived service quality influences students’ satisfaction? Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(7-8), 923-934. [DOI]
23. Lebanese American University. (2017). Exit survey 2016-2017. Available online at https://dira.lau.edu.lb/images/Analysis%20of%20Exit%20Survey%20Results%202016-2017.pdf [Article]
24. Maguad, B. A., & Krone, R. M. (2017). Managing for quality in higher education: A systems perspective. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Ventus. [Article]
25. Mediterranean Network of National Information Centres on the Recognition of Qualifications [MERIC-Net]. (2019). The higher education system in Lebanon: National report. Available online at http://www.meric-net.eu/files/fileusers/3760_Lebanon_National%20Report_MERIC-Net.pdf [Article]
26. Muhammad, N., Kakakhel S. J., Baloch, Q. B., & Ali, F. (2018). Service quality the road ahead for student’s satisfaction. Review of Public Administration and Management, 6(2), 1-6. [DOI]
27. Muthamia, S. M. (2016). An assessment of university service quality and its effects on student satisfaction: A case of United States International University [Master’s thesis]. United States International University, Kenya. [Article]
28. Nasser, R. N., Khoury, B., & Abouchedid, K. (2008). University students’ knowledge of services and programs in relation to satisfaction: A case study of a private university in Lebanon. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(1), 80-97. [DOI]
29. Nauffal, D. I. (2009). Do educational outcomes in Lebanese universities differ based on the academic model? Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 2(1), 6-19. [DOI]
30. Nauffal, D. I., & Nasser, R. N. (2007). The American higher educational model in Lebanon: Organizational cultures and their impact on student outcomes and satisfaction. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 12(1), 43-65.
31. Oluwatayo, J. A. (2012). Validity and reliability issues in educational research. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(2), 391-400. [Article]
32. Omidian, F., & Golchin Nia, Z. (2018). Assessment of educational service quality at master’s level in an Iranian university based on HEdPERF model. International Journal of Applied Research in Management and Economics, 1(3), 58-63. [DOI]
33. Osman, A. R., & Saputra, R. S. (2019). A pragmatic model of student satisfaction: A viewpoint of private higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(2), 142-165. [DOI]
34. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
35. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467. [DOI]
36. Saba ’Ayon, N. (2015). Academic advising: Perceptions of students in a Lebanese university. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 1(2), 118-126.
37. Saif, N. I. (2014). The effect of service quality on student satisfaction: A field study for health services administration students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(8), 172-181.
38. Saliba, K., & Gorenc Zoran, A. (2019). Service quality at the Lebanese University: Faculty of public health. Journal of Universal Excellence, 8(1), 1-25.
39. Salloum, W. A. (2019). The impact of implementing students’ support services on students’ satisfaction: A case study of a private university in Lebanon. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Engaged Management Scholarship. [DOI]
40. Truong, H. V., Pham, C. H., & Vo, N. H. (2016). Service quality and students level of satisfaction in private colleges in Vietnam. International Journal of Financial Research, 7(3), 121-128. [DOI]
41. Turner, D. A. (2011). Quality in Higher Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
42. Twum, F. O., & Peprah, W. K. (2020). The impact of service quality on students’ satisfaction. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(10), 169-181. [DOI]
43. Việt, V. V. (2021). The effect of service quality dimensions on student’s satisfaction and loyalty. ABAC Journal, 41(1), 81-99. [Article]
44. Weerasinghe, I. M. S., & Fernando, R. L. (2017). Students’ satisfaction in higher education: Literature review. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(5), 533-539. [Article]
45. Weisburd, D., & Britt, C. (2014). Statistics in criminal justice (4th ed.). New York: Springer.
46. Yahaya, W., Asante, J., & Alhassan, I. (2020). Institutional service quality and students’ satisfaction: Perceptions from the University for Development Studies. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 22(7), 31-42.
47. Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49-54. [DOI]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.